UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 12. Aug. 2025

UPC_CoA_699/2025

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 2

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
354.3penalty order — amount and conditions for forfeitureBindendPursuant to R. 354.3 RoP an order or decision may include an order for the forfeiture of a penalty sum in case of (future) non-compliance with an order
354.4enforcement proceedings for penalty forfeitureBindendThe actual forfeiture of any such penalty sums first needs to be established by the LDM in enforcement proceeding upon Fujifilm's request or of the Court's own motion (R. 354.4 RoP).
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
Zitiert inDatumRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_930/2025

Court of Appeal

29. Jan. 2026confidentiality of information communicated pursuant to court orderBindendsee CoA 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025, Kodak v Fujifilm, para. 45
UPC_CFI_365/2023

Mannheim LD

23. Juli 2025jurisdictionBindendafter the Court of Appeal decided upon and in part upheld the 1st enforcement order of 23 July 2025 (CoA Order of 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025)
UPC_CFI_365/2023

Mannheim LD

30. Jan. 2026jurisdictionBindendafter the Court of Appeal decided upon and in part upheld the 1st enforcement order of 23 July 2025 (CoA Order of 14 October 2025, UPC_CoA_699/2025)