UPClytics
DeutschEnglish
AnmeldenRegistrieren
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CoA 805/2025

27. Aug. 2025·EP3821580: METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR EFFICIENT NETWORK PROTECTION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed
Verfahrensart
Berufung
Kategorie
Hauptberufung
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Ralph Nack (Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB); (MFG Patentanwälte PartG mbB)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Klaus Haft (Hoyng Rokh Monegier); (Samson & Partner)
Division
Court of Appeal
Richter
Technology
Telecommunications
Sprache
English
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-09-01
    AbgewiesenRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)

    The Court of Appeal (standing judge) dismissed Centripetal Limited's request for discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP) of the Mannheim Local Division's refusal to permit further written pleadings (R. 36 RoP) in its infringement action against Keysight Technologies concerning EP 3 821 580. The request for review was denied because the impugned order was not manifestly wrong.

    Rechtsfragen:Discretionary review (R. 220.3 RoP)Further exchange of written pleadings (R. 36 RoP)Manifestly wrong standard for review
Dokumente
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-09-01Nicht öffentlich
Outcome of the Order2025-09-01Nicht öffentlich
Order2025-09-01Öffentlich
Panel-Appointment2025-08-29Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_05_Appellants_Panel_Review_Request2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_04_Judge-Rapporteurs_Procedural_Order2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_02_Request_Further_Exchange_of_Written_Pleadings2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_03_Respondents_Comments_on_Appelants_Request2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
20250827_Noerr_Application_for_Discretionary_Review2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_01_Proof_of_payment2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich
Exhibit_DR_06_Panel_Order2025-08-27Nicht öffentlich