UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 13. Dez. 2024

UPC_CoA_810/2024

METHOD AND PRODUCT FOR LOCALISED OR SPATIAL DETECTION OF NUCLEIC ACID IN A TISSUE SAMPLE

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealGenericCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 3

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
223urgency — suspensive effect of appeal requires extreme urgencyBindendThe requirement of an extreme urgency under R 223 RoP has to be established by the applicant. In the present case, the applicant has not evidenced the existence of an extreme urgency.
223.4standing judge decision without hearing respondent — extreme urgencyBindendCurio filed a separate R 223.4 RoP application for suspensive effect in which it requests the impugned order be given suspensive effect and the application for suspensive effect be decided by the standing judge
220.2appeal against interlocutory ordersHintergrundCurio filed an appeal under Rule 220.2 RoP (PR_APL_65956/2024 UPC_CoA_805/2024) against said order.

EPÜ-Artikel · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
41(1)security for costs — alleged contrariness to Art. 41(1) UPCAHintergrundthe impugned order is manifestly wrong to the extent it has granted a security for costs to the claimant in the main action because it is contrary to Art. 41(1) UPCA
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.