UPC CoA 813/2025

Vor dem UPC: Dreame Technology AB (6 Verfahren)·Dyson Technology Limited (16 Verfahren)

• 2026-03-06
  Appeal RoP220.1Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal extended the provisional measures (preliminary injunction) granted against Dreame International, Teqphone GmbH, and Dreame Technology AB to cover Dyson's 'New Dreame Products' and 'Newest Dreame Products' (EP 3 119 235, vacuum cleaner patent). The Court held that: (1) a structural element in a claim must be interpreted considering both its function and physical configuration; (2) the fact that an infringer has previously committed only certain infringing acts does not restrict an injunction to those specific acts – the existence of past infringement establishes a risk of all acts of use; (3) the date for R. 213.1 RoP compliance was set at 31 calendar days after service.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Claim construction (structural and functional features)
  • Scope of injunction in provisional measures (Art. 62(1); Art. 25(a) UPCA)
  • Extension of injunction to new products
  • Risk of further infringement
• 2026-03-06
  Appeal RoP220.1Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal referred a question to the CJEU for a preliminary ruling on whether an 'authorised representative' under EU product safety regulations (Regulations 2023/988 and 2019/1020) can be enjoined as an 'intermediary' for patent infringement purposes under Art. 9(1)(a) of Directive 2004/48. The case arises from Dyson's appeal against Hamburg Local Division's refusal to grant provisional measures against Eurep GmbH, the EU authorised representative of Dreame International.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)

  • CJEU referral for preliminary ruling
  • Authorised representative as intermediary (Art. 9(1)(a) Directive 2004/48)
  • International jurisdiction over online sales
  • EU product safety regulations (Reg. 2023/988, Reg. 2019/1020)
  • Provisional measures against intermediaries