UPC Analytics
DEEN
Übersicht · Eingereicht: 20. Nov. 2025

UPC_CoA_911/2025

METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Verfahrensordnung · 6

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
223.4extreme urgency application for suspensive effect to standing judgeBindendIn cases of extreme urgency the applicant may apply at any time without formality for an order for suspensive effect to the standing judge pursuant to R. 223.4 RoP.
224.1requirement to lodge statement of appeal before suspensive effect applicationBindendfor this provision to be applicable, the applicant must first have lodged a Statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP) and paid the appeal fee in accordance with R. 228 RoP
228appeal fee payment condition for suspensive effect admissibilityBindendthe applicant must first have lodged a Statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP) and paid the appeal fee in accordance with R. 228 RoP (Court of Appeal 15 August 2025, UPC_CoA_740/2025
221leave to appeal cost decisionsBindendOn 19 November 2025, Suinno lodged an application for leave to appeal, pursuant to R. 221 RoP, against the impugned decision
151application for cost decisionBindendOn 7 August 2025, Microsoft lodged an application for a cost decision, pursuant to R. 151 RoP
223suspensive effect of appealBindendSuinno asked the Court to grant suspensive effect regarding the impugned order pursuant to R. 223 RoP until the appeal has been decided.

UPC-Berufungsgericht · 1

QuelleRechtsfrageBindungskraftAuszug
UPC_CoA_740/2025admissibility conditions for standing-judge suspensive effect application — prior statement of appeal and fee payment requiredBindendCourt of Appeal 15 August 2025, UPC_CoA_740/2025
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Bisher in keiner anderen Entscheidung unseres Korpus zitiert.