| 2025-08-26 | UPC_APP_33609/2025 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division granted MediaTek Germany GmbH's application requiring Huawei Technologies to provide security for legal costs under R. 158.1 RoP, setting a six-week deadline for compliance, given Huawei's non-EU registered seat and risks associated with enforcing a cost award in China. |
| 2025-08-21 | UPC_APP_34962/2025 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division (Panel 2) issued a confidentiality order under R. 262A RoP in SEP/FRAND infringement proceedings, protecting Huawei's licence agreements submitted in response to MediaTek's R. 190 document production request, while specifying who may access the confidential information. |
| 2025-08-21 | ACT_30657/2025 | Dusseldorf LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Düsseldorf Local Division granted a joint application by both parties to stay the infringement proceedings under R.295(d) and R.296.2 RoP pending ongoing settlement negotiations. The stay was granted until reinstitution of proceedings at the request of either party. This is the underlying infringement action UPC_CFI_580/2025 (Tridonic v. Inventronics). |
| 2025-08-01 | UPC_APP_33556/2025 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division partially granted MediaTek Germany GmbH's application for document production of licence agreements under R. 190 RoP in Huawei's infringement proceedings, classifying specified portions of the application relating to licence negotiations as confidential under R. 262A RoP. |
| 2025-08-01 | UPC_APP_33556/2025 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Munich Local Division issued a confidentiality order under Rule 262A RoP and Rule 190 RoP in Huawei v MediaTek Germany infringement proceedings (EP 4 142 215). The order established a confidentiality club for license agreement documents sought in discovery, in accordance with the parties' agreed NDA. Access was restricted to named representatives and in-house counsel. Further confidentiality measures for oral hearing, judgment publication, and a separate production request were deferred. |
| 2025-08-01 | UPC_APP_33544/2025 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Procedural order by Munich Local Division Panel 2 in Huawei Technologies v MediaTek (EP 4 142 215) granting MediaTek Germany's confidentiality application under R. 262A RoP over the non-technical part of its defence (Klageerwiderung), based on an extra-judicial NDA concluded between the MediaTek group and Huawei on 11 July 2025. |
| 2025-07-31 | UPC_APP_34041/2025 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division granted a short extension of the deadline for commenting on a R. 262.1(b) access-to-file application in NEC Corporation's SEP infringement proceedings against TCL, to ensure equal time limits for both parties. |
| 2025-06-16 | UPC_APP_28386/2025 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Munich Local Division (16 June 2025) stayed the infringement and revocation proceedings concerning EP 3 742 231 by consent of all parties (R. 295(d) RoP) until three months after the next EPO Board of Appeal oral hearing in T0187/24, to allow settlement negotiations. The oral hearing scheduled for 7 October 2025 was cancelled. |
| 2025-06-05 | UPC_APP_25858/2025 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Vergleich | The Munich Local Division permitted Phoenix Contact GmbH & Co. KG's withdrawal of its patent infringement action against ILME entities concerning EP3602692 following a settlement, allowed cancellation of the scheduled oral hearing, and ordered 40% reimbursement of court fees under R.307.9 VerfO as the withdrawal occurred after closure of the written procedure. |
| 2025-06-05 | UPC_APP_25959/2025 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Zurückgenommen | The Munich Local Division issued a decision in a case where both the infringement action (by PHOENIX CONTACT against ILME) and the counterclaim for revocation (by ILME) were withdrawn before the close of the intermediate procedure. The court ordered a 40% refund of court fees for each party (claimant and defendants) and set the value of the infringement action at EUR 750,000 and the counterclaim for revocation at EUR 1,125,000 (150% of infringement value). |
| 2025-05-13 | UPC_APP_18695/2025 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division issued a confidentiality order under R. 262.2 and R. 262A RoP in Huawei's infringement action against MediaTek, classifying specified technical and commercial information in the statement of claim as confidential and restricting its use outside the proceedings. |
| 2025-05-13 | UPC_APP_18691/2025 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division issued a procedural order granting Huawei's application for confidentiality protection under Rules 262.2 and 262A RoP for information in the statement of claim and exhibits marked as confidential in its infringement action against MediaTek concerning EP 3 905 840 B1. |
| 2025-02-28 | UPC_APP_2829/2025 | Munich LD | Amend Document | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division ruled on Esko-Graphics' R. 263 RoP application to amend its infringement claim to include the Netherlands (where the patent had since been restored) after the Statement of Claim had been filed, in proceedings against XSYS entities. |
| 2025-02-11 | UPC_APP_3915/2025 | Munich LD | Application Rop 365 | Prozessual | Vergleich | Infringement action by BSN Medical GmbH against Brightwake Ltd. and Advancis Medical entities for infringement of EP 3 831 350 and EP 3 033 058 concluded by court-confirmed settlement. The parties reached a settlement agreement filed on 07 February 2025. The order confirms the settlement and addresses a confidentiality request. |
| 2025-02-10 | ORD_6847/2025 | Munich LD | Generic Order | motionName.jurisdictional | Abgewiesen | The Munich Local Division rejected XSYS's preliminary objection to the court's jurisdiction, holding that the UPC has jurisdiction for acts alleged to have occurred before UPCA's entry into force and before opt-out withdrawal, and that jurisdiction and applicable law are separate questions. |
| 2025-01-27 | UPC_APP_2740/2025 | Unknown | — | Kosten | Nur Kosten | Procedural order by the Munich Local Division on an application for reimbursement of court fees (Rule 370.9(b)(iii) RoP) following withdrawal of an application for provisional measures by Avago Technologies International Sales Pte. Limited. The court applied Rule 370.9(b)(iii) by analogy to provisional measures proceedings (not directly applicable as written for main actions) and ordered reimbursement of 20% of court fees, as the withdrawal occurred before completion of oral proceedings. |
| 2025-01-24 | UPC_APP_2192/2025 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Zurückgenommen | Decision by Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_487/2023, 24 January 2025) permitting withdrawal of TCL defendants' counterclaims for revocation and FRAND-licence offer. 60% of court fees were reimbursed for the revocation counterclaim. The court held that court fees are payable for FRAND-licence offer counterclaims by analogy under R. 370 RoP, and that such fees had been properly paid so no full refund was warranted. |
| 2025-01-17 | UPC_APP_2273/2025 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Vergleich | Decision from the Munich Local Division (UPC_CFI_498/2023) declaring the infringement action by NEC against TCL entities closed following a contractual settlement reached before closure of the written proceedings. NEC withdrew the infringement action (R. 265 RoP) and requested 60% reimbursement of court fees, relying on the settlement. The Court confirmed each party would bear its own costs and addressed the fee reimbursement request. |
| 2025-01-13 | UPC_APP_223/2025 | Unknown | — | Einstweilige Verfügung | Zurückgenommen | The Munich Local Division allowed Avago Technologies' withdrawal of its application for provisional measures against Realtek Semiconductor. The ex parte order had not yet been served, and the proceedings were declared closed. |
| 2025-01-10 | UPC_APP_68359/2024 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Zurückgenommen | Decision of the Munich Local Division permitting withdrawal of the infringement action by Dexcom Inc. against Abbott Laboratories and multiple Abbott entities, and withdrawal of the counterclaim for revocation and patent amendment application by the defendants. All parties mutually consented to withdrawal prior to the final decision date. Each party bears its own costs. |
| 2025-01-07 | UPC_APP_66720/2024 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Zurückgenommen | The Munich Local Division granted Tesla's application to withdraw its counterclaim for revocation in the infringement proceedings brought by Avago Technologies, as both parties consented and no cost decision was requested; the revocation proceedings are formally terminated. |
| 2025-01-07 | UPC_APP_66758/2024 | Munich LD | Application Rop 265 | Prozessual | Zurückgenommen | The Munich Local Division allowed Avago Technologies International Sales' withdrawal of its infringement action against Tesla Germany GmbH and Tesla Manufacturing Brandenburg SE. Each party bears its own costs. |
| 2025-01-03 | UPC_APP_61570/2024 | Munich CD | Application RoP262.1 (b) | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Central Division granted Berggren Oy's application under Rule 262.1(b) RoP for access to all written pleadings and evidence filed in the NanoString v. Harvard revocation action, given Berggren's professional interest as a UPC representative firm. |
| 2024-12-17 | UPC_APP_56792/2024 | Munich CD | Generic application | Kosten | Nur prozessual | Order of the Central Division (Munich Section) on a request by NanoString Technologies Europe Limited to release a security for legal costs imposed under Rule 158 RoP. The Court confirmed it has power to release security under Rule 352.2 RoP and set out the conditions for doing so, examining whether the reasons for imposing the security had ceased to exist following a final non-appealable judgment. |
| 2024-11-26 | UPC_APP_59539/2024 | Munich LD | Generic application | Kosten | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division considered the defendants' application for security for costs from the claimant GXD-Bio Corporation (a Korean IP monetization/NPE company), finding the claimant had insufficient financial resources based on credit rating and corporate structure evidence. The court addressed the appropriate level of security under Rule 158 RoP. |
| 2024-11-15 | UPC_CFI_515/2024 | Unknown | — | — | Nur prozessual | Munich Local Division ordered reimbursement of 60% of court fees (EUR 6,600) to Philips following the withdrawal of its application for provisional measures one day after filing. The Court held that R.370(9)(b)(i) RoP applies by analogy to withdrawals before the written procedure is closed. |
| 2024-11-04 | UPC_APP_54214/2024 | Munich CD | Application Rop262 3 | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Central Division (Munich) addressed Mathys & Squire LLP's request for access to pleadings under Rule 262.1(b) RoP in the Astellas v. Healios revocation action, ruling on confidentiality of certain pipeline information following the parties' settlement. |
| 2024-10-22 | UPC_APP_47154/2024 | Munich CD | Application RoP262.1 (b) | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Central Division Section ruled on a third-party access application (R. 262.1(b) RoP) by Dehns (a large UPC representative firm) seeking access to all written pleadings and evidence in the Amgen-Regeneron revocation and counterclaim proceedings concerning EP 3 666 797 (decided on 16 July 2024). The court distinguished between procedural documents falling and not falling within the categories of 'written pleadings' and 'evidence', granting access to the qualifying documents. |
| 2024-10-11 | ORD_56109/2024 | Munich LD | Generic Order | Kosten | Zurückgenommen | The Munich Local Division accepted the withdrawal of MSG Maschinenbau GmbH's infringement action and declared the revocation counterclaim moot (gegenstandslos), following the parties' agreement. Each party bears its own costs; partial court fee refunds were ordered for both sides. |
| 2024-08-22 | UPC_APP_588681/2023 | Munich CD | Application RoP262.1 (b) | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Central Division granted Mathys & Squire's application for public access under R.262.1(b) RoP to written pleadings and evidence in the settled Astellas v Healios revocation proceedings (EP 3 056 563), holding that after settlement the integrity of proceedings is no longer at stake and public access should normally be granted. |
| 2024-08-14 | UPC_APP_40651/2024 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Munich Local Division procedural order establishing a confidentiality regime (R. 262A RoP) for information in TCL group defendants' FRAND counterclaim and statement of defence in NEC Corporation's infringement action concerning EP 2 645 714. The court classified detailed FRAND negotiation information and financial data as confidential, restricting access on the claimant's side to named individuals and legal representatives, and imposed ongoing obligations of confidentiality. |
| 2024-08-14 | UPC_APP_40654/2024 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division issued a procedural order in NEC Corporation v TCL/TCT group (UPC_CFI_498/2023, EP 3 057 321) on confidentiality protection under R. 262A RoP. The order confirmed the terms of the agreed confidentiality club arrangement for the defendants' FRAND counterclaim submission, following agreement in principle reached between the parties. |
| 2024-08-13 | UPC_APP_39047/2024 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Vergleich | The Munich Local Division permitted Network System Technologies LLC's partial withdrawal of its infringement action against Texas Instruments Incorporated and Texas Instruments Deutschland GmbH following a settlement, while the action against Volkswagen AG and AUDI AG continued, applying R.265 RoP to a partial subjective withdrawal. |
| 2024-08-09 | UPC_APP_38165/2024 | Munich LD | Application RoP262A | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Local Division issued a procedural order under Rule 262A RoP concerning the protection of confidential information submitted by the defendants in an infringement action regarding EP 4 087 195. No substantive patent ruling was made. |
| 2024-08-06 | ORD_44084/2024 | Munich LD | Generic Order | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Order of the Munich Local Division on the service of the statement of claim on TCL Industrial Holdings Co., Ltd. (Defendant 2), a company domiciled in China, in infringement proceedings by NEC Corporation against multiple TCL entities concerning EP 3 057 321. The Court addressed the procedure for effecting service on a defendant domiciled outside the EU. |
| 2024-08-06 | UPC_APP_33560/2024 | Munich LD | Generic application | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | Procedural order by Local Division Munich (UPC_CFI_67/2024, 6 August 2024) dismissing applicants' request for an order dispensing with translation of certain German-language exhibits. The court held that a translation waiver was not appropriate after balancing the parties' interests under R. 24(j) and 25(1)(g) RoP and Art. 51(1) UPCA. |
| 2023-12-28 | UPC_APP_588681/2023 | Munich CD | Application RoP262.1 (b) | Prozessual | Nur prozessual | The Munich Central Division issued a preliminary order in a Rule 262.1(b) access-to-file application by Mathys & Squire LLP, deciding to await the outcome of pending Court of Appeal proceedings on a related access application before ruling on the present request. |