ACT 551054/2023
Jul 14, 2023·EP3295663 · DIGITALLY OVERLAYING AN IMAGE WITH ANOTHER IMAGE
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionProvisional measuresCategoryProvisional measures
- Parties
- Claimants
- AIM Sport Development AGOperating co.
Representatives- Ari Laakkonen-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Johanna Flythström-Roschier
- Mikael Segercrantz-Roschier
- Siddharth Kusumakar-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- David Por-Clifford Chance Partnerschaft mbB
Respondents- Supponor OyOperating co.
- Supponor LimitedOperating co.
- Supponor SASUOperating co.
- Supponor Italia SRLOperating co.
- Supponor España SLOperating co.
Representatives- Henrik Lehment-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Matthias Sonntag-Gleiss Lutz
- Panu Siitonen-Hannes Snellman
- Division
- Helsinki LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Apr 29, 2026
| Preliminary injunction granted | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 54% (38/70) | 124 |
| Helsinki LD | — | Locked |
| Judge Petri Rinkinen | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Samuel Granata | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Mélanie Bessaud | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Eric Augarde | — | Locked |
At the UPC: AIM Sport Development AG (15 cases)·Supponor Group (14 cases)
This dispute contains 8 other proceedings
UPC CFI 403/2025·UPC APP 1211/2025·UPC APP 65722/2024·UPC CoA 489/2023·UPC CoA 500/2023 and 3 more
4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 104/2026·UPC CoA 107/2026·UPC CoA 108/2026·UPC CFI 214/2023
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Helsinki LD·2023
- 2026-04-29Application for provisional measuresPublic
Summary: The Court disposed the preliminary injunction application CMS no ACT_551054/2023 under R. 360 RoP, finding it had become devoid of purpose after the commercial window of opportunity had passed. The Court ordered AIM Sport (the applicant) to bear TGI's costs of the preliminary injunction proceedings at the Court of First Instance up to a ceiling of EUR 800,000, based on the outcome of the related infringement action (UPC_CFI_214/2023) in which the patent was found not infringed. The value of the preliminary injunction proceedings was set at EUR 9.9 million.
Show the legal issues (6)
- Disposal of preliminary injunction application devoid of purpose (R. 360 RoP)
- Cost allocation for moot preliminary injunction proceedings
- Applicability of Art. 69(1) UPCA to cost decisions in disposed provisional measures
- Ceiling for recoverable costs under Administrative Committee Scale (EUR 800,000)
- Whether separate cost ceiling applies to standalone vs. accompanied preliminary injunction applications (Section 5b of Scale)
- Appeal time limits for orders disposing provisional measures under R. 360 and R. 363.2 RoP
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Receipt | 2026-07-06 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-07-06 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2026-07-06 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-05-30 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2026-05-29 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2026-05-29 | Not public |
| Application document Applicant | 2026-05-29 | Not public |
| Exhibit Applicant | 2026-05-29 | Not public |
| Exhibit Applicant | 2026-05-29 | Not public |
| Communication | 2026-05-27 | Not public |