UPC CoA 108/2026

At the UPC: AIM Sport Development AG (15 cases)·Supponor Group (14 cases)

• 2026-07-16
  AppealPublic

  Summary: The Court of Appeal granted AIM's application to correct an obvious error in the Statement of Appeal by deleting TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited as a respondent, as its inclusion was an inadvertent mistake. The Registry was also ordered to remove TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited from the case register.

  Show the legal issues (3)

  • Correction of obvious error in Statement of Appeal
  • Deletion of erroneously included respondent from appeal proceedings
  • Registry obligations to maintain accurate case files under R. 56 and R. 73 Rules governing the Registry
• 2026-07-08
  Appeal RoP220.1Public

  Summary: The Court of Appeal ruled that the appeal fee of EUR 20,400 paid by AIM Sport Development AG is both necessary and sufficient for lodging an appeal under R. 220.1(a) RoP against an order disposing of a provisional measures application. The Court also invited AIM to clarify why Respondent 6 (TGI Sport Virtual UK Limited) is involved in the PI appeal proceedings.

  Show the legal issues (4)

  • Applicable court fee for appeal under R. 220.1(a) RoP against order disposing provisional measures application
  • Whether appeal is under R. 220.1(a) or R. 220.1(c) RoP
  • Application of R. 363.2 RoP classifying R. 360 RoP decisions as final decisions within meaning of R. 220.1(a) RoP
  • Scope of appeal parties in PI proceedings