View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionApplication for costsCategoryCosts assessments
- Parties
- Claimants
- Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Bolko Ehlgen-Linklaters LLP
- Julia Schönbohm-Linklaters LLP
- Olaf Isfortsupporting-Schneiders & Behrendt
Respondents- expert e-Commerce GmbHOperating co.
- expert klein GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Dirk Jestaedt-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Bernhard Ganahlsupporting-HGF Europe LLP
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringSemiconductors
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 14, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Ronny Thomas | Locked |
At the UPC: Seoul Semiconductor Group (29 cases)·expert e-Commerce GmbH (14 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024·UPC CoA 762/2024 and 11 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2025-04-14Application For CostsPublic
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed as inadmissible the defendants' (expert e-Commerce GmbH and expert klein GmbH) application for costs assessment under R.151 RoP in infringement proceedings brought by Seoul Viosys concerning EP3223320, because the application was filed more than one month after the underlying decision of 10 October 2024.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Time limit for costs application (R.151 RoP)
- Admissibility of costs assessment request
- Relationship between R.151 RoP and Art. 69 UPCA on costs entitlement
- CMS upload and service date
Documents
- 3AFEF366796D37BF253A2541F42CF933_de.pdf2025-04-14DE