View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Odiporo GmbHOperating co.
- Shamrock Mobile GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Corin Gittinger-Freshfields
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 30, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 10 other proceedings
UPC CoA 543/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 219/2023·ORD 25614/2024·ORD 40039/2024 and 5 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 332/2024·UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-04-30
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division issued a procedural order in the Panasonic v Xiaomi infringement action concerning EP2568724, granting Panasonic's request for disclosure of a licence agreement (with possible redactions) as relevant to the claim, in the context of document production proceedings.
Show the legal issues (4)
- Document production (R.190 RoP)
- Disclosure of licence agreements
- Redaction of sensitive passages
- Principle of party presentation (Art. 43 UPCA)
Documents
- 3E39E7963AE704923EF3729606167BFB_de.pdf2024-04-30DE