View all cases
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dolby International ABOperating co.
Representatives- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Tilmann Müller-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Georg Arnetsbergersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Johannes Möllersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- HP Deutschland GmbHOperating co.
- HP Inc.Operating co.
- HP International SARLOperating co.
- HP Austria GmbHOperating co.
- HP France SASOperating co.
- HP Belgium SPRLOperating co.
- HP Inc Danmark ApSOperating co.
- HP Finland OyOperating co.
- HP Italy S.r.l.Operating co.
- Hewlett-Packard Nederland BVOperating co.
- HP PPS Sverige ABOperating co.
- HPCP – Computing and Printing Portugal, Unipessoal, Lda.Operating co.
- Hewlett-Packard d.o.o.Operating co.
- Hewlett-Packard Luxembourg SCAOperating co.
Representatives- Frank-Erich Hufnagel-Freshfields
- Nina Bayerl-Freshfields
- Stefan Dorn-Freshfields
- Sabrina Biedermann-Freshfields
- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Vanessa Werlin-Freshfields
- Division
- —
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- —
- EPO Opposition
- Unified Patents, LLCAdmissible2022-04-14
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
At the UPC: Dolby Group (38 cases)·HP Group (22 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
CC 21620/2024·UPC CFI 457/2023·UPC APP 23193/2024·UPC APP 25069/2024·UPC APP 58951/2024 and 1 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 1446/2025·UPC CFI 58/2025·UPC CFI 694/2024·UPC CFI 235/2024·CC 21152/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: 2024
Decisions
- 2024-01-19
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division issued a procedural order in Dolby v. HP entities, rejecting the defendants' application for an extension of the deadline to file their statement of defence, citing the strict time limits regime under the UPC Rules of Procedure and the absence of exceptional circumstances justifying an extension over the claimant's objection.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Rule 9.3 RoP: extension of time limits
- Strict time limits regime under UPC RoP
- Conditions for granting extension over opposing party's objection
Documents
- 2024-01-19%20LD%20Dusseldorf%20UPC_CFI_457-2023%20ORD_2037_2024%20App_1714-2024%20anonymized.pdf2024-01-19DE