- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryConfidentiality (RoP 262A / 262.2)
- Parties
- Claimants
- Dolby International ABOperating co.
Representatives- Volkmar Henke-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Tilman Müller-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Georg Anetsbergersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
- Johannes Möllersupporting-Bardehle Pagenberg
Respondents- HP Deutschland GmbHOperating co.
- HP Inc.Operating co.
- HP International SARLOperating co.
- HP Austria GmbHOperating co.
- HP France SASOperating co.
- HP Belgium SPRLOperating co.
- HP Finland OyOperating co.
- Hewlett-Packard Nederland BVOperating co.
- HP Italy S.r.l.Operating co.
- HP Inc Danmark ApSOperating co.
- HP PPS Sverige ABOperating co.
- Hewlett-Packard Luxembourg SCAOperating co.
- HPCP – Computing and Printing Portugal, Unipessoal, Lda.Operating co.
- Hewlett-Packard d.o.o.Operating co.
- HP Inc Bulgaria EOODOperating co.
Representatives- Frank-Erich Hufnagel-Freshfields
- Nina Bayerl-Freshfields
- Stephan Dorn-Freshfields
- Sabrina Biedermann-Freshfields
- Eva Acker-Freshfields
- Vanessa Werlin-Freshfields
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 22, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- Unified Patents, LLCAdmissible2022-04-14
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Ronny Thomas | Locked |
At the UPC: Dolby Group (38 cases)·HP Group (22 cases)
This dispute contains 6 other proceedings
CC 21620/2024·UPC CFI 457/2023·UPC APP 1714/2024·UPC APP 23193/2024·UPC APP 58951/2024 and 1 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 1446/2025·UPC CFI 58/2025·UPC CFI 694/2024·UPC CFI 235/2024·CC 21152/2024 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
- 2024-07-22Application RoP262APublic
Summary: Procedural order from the Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_457/2023) on a confidentiality protection application under R. 262A RoP by HP defendants in Dolby's infringement proceedings concerning EP 3 490 258. The Court ruled that an intervener (Access Advance LLC) is to be treated as a party under R. 315.4 RoP and is therefore entitled to at least one natural person in the confidential club, in addition to legal representatives.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality protection (R. 262A RoP)
- Status of intervener as party (R. 315.4 RoP)
- Confidential club membership for intervener
- 9BA0589766993A24EA7150DAEBA33A99_de.pdf2024-07-22DE
- ORD_25519-2024_EN.pdf2024-07-22EN