UPClytics
View all cases

UPC APP 18259/2024

·EP3876490: METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR OVERLAYING MULTI-CARRIER AND DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNALS IN A BROADBAND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM

Case details
Status
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties
Claimants
Reps: Constanze Krenz (DLA Piper); David Kless (DLA Piper)
Respondents
Reps: Christoph Walke (Cohausz & Florack); Matthias Waters (Cohausz & Florack); Martin Rütten (Cohausz & Florack)
Division
Paris CD
Judges
Technology
Telecommunications
Language
First decided
Apr 25, 2024
Decisions
  • 2024-04-25
    Generic application

    The Paris Central Division judge-rapporteur issued a procedural order in the Toyota Motor Europe revocation action against Neo Wireless, denying Neo Wireless's request to stay the proceedings pending EPO opposition proceedings and appeal of a preliminary objection. The court held that pending EPO proceedings did not meet the 'rapid decision' threshold under Art. 33(10) UPCA, and that the preliminary objection appeal did not justify a stay.

    Legal issues:Stay of proceedings pending EPO opposition (Art. 33(10) UPCA, R. 295(a) RoP)Meaning of 'rapid decision' from EPOStay pending appeal of preliminary objection
Documents
  • 6654E18E3FA37DDA7E5C3DFDB4FB7914_en.pdf2024-04-25EN