View all cases
UPC APP 18259/2024
EP3876490 SEP · METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR OVERLAYING MULTI-CARRIER AND DIRECT SEQUENCE SPREAD SPECTRUM SIGNALS IN A BROADBAND WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Toyota Motor Europe NV/SAOperating co.
RespondentsRepresentatives- Christoph Walke-Cohausz & Florack
- Matthias Waters-Cohausz & Florack
- Martin Rütten-Cohausz & Florack
- Division
- Paris CD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Apr 25, 2024
- EPO Opposition
- Volkswagen AktiengesellschaftWithdrawn2023-09-11
- Hyundai Motor Deutschland GmbHAdmissible2023-09-29
- Tesla Germany GmbHAdmissible2023-09-29
- Toyota Motor CorporationAdmissible2023-10-20
- Nissan Jidosha Kabushiki-KaishaAdmissible2023-11-16
- FCA Germany GmbHAdmissible2023-11-16
- Continental Automotive Technologies GmbHAdmissible2024-02-15
- Flach Bauer & Partner Patentanwälte mbBAdmissible2024-02-16
- Ford-Werke GmbHAdmissible2024-02-16
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked |
| Judge Maximilian Haedicke | Locked |
At the UPC: Toyota Motor Europe NV/SA (3 cases)·Neo Wireless GmbH & Co. KG (3 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 2 other proceedings
Decisions
- 2024-04-25
Summary: The Paris Central Division judge-rapporteur issued a procedural order in the Toyota Motor Europe revocation action against Neo Wireless, denying Neo Wireless's request to stay the proceedings pending EPO opposition proceedings and appeal of a preliminary objection. The court held that pending EPO proceedings did not meet the 'rapid decision' threshold under Art. 33(10) UPCA, and that the preliminary objection appeal did not justify a stay.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Stay of proceedings pending EPO opposition (Art. 33(10) UPCA, R. 295(a) RoP)
- Meaning of 'rapid decision' from EPO
- Stay pending appeal of preliminary objection
Documents
- 6654E18E3FA37DDA7E5C3DFDB4FB7914_en.pdf2024-04-25EN