- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryConfidentiality (RoP 262A / 262.2)
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Odiporo GmbHOperating co.
- Shamrock Mobile GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Corin Gittinger-Freshfields
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 10, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
This dispute contains 10 other proceedings
UPC CoA 543/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 219/2023·ORD 25614/2024·ORD 40039/2024 and 5 more
6 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 332/2024·UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023 and 1 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
- 2024-07-10Application RoP262APublic
Summary: Procedural order from the Mannheim Local Division (UPC_CFI_219/2023) on Panasonic's application for confidentiality protection under R. 262A RoP in infringement proceedings concerning EP 2 568 724 against Xiaomi entities. The Court addressed the composition of the confidential club and held that access to confidential information before the UPC must be restricted to duly authorised representatives under Art. 48 UPCA, refusing to follow the Munich Local Division's approach of permitting cross-proceeding coordination.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality protection (R. 262A RoP)
- Confidential club membership
- Scope of authorised representatives under Art. 48 UPCA
- 99F4724CDC9D494EAF0BCFCA063F6629_de.pdf2024-07-10DE