View all cases
UPC APP 3393/2024
Jan 22, 2024·EP3883277 Unitary patent · METHOD FOR COMMUNICATING SPATIALLY LOCATED INFORMATION TO A MOBILE TERMINAL
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionGenericCategoryCosts assessments
- Parties
- Claimants
- Hanshow France SASOperating co.
- Hanshow Technology Co. LtdOperating co.
- Hanshow Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Hanshow Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
Representatives- Roland Küppers-Taylor Wessing
Respondents- SES-imagotag SAOperating co.
Representatives- Anton Horn-Heuking
- Alexandre Hoffmann-Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner LLP
- Division
- Munich LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringAudio-visual technology · Digital communication · Computer technology · IT methods for management
- InstrumentsMeasurement
- Language
- German
- EPO Opposition
- Hanshow Germany GmbHAdmissible2023-10-19
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
| Judge Tobias Pichlmaier | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked |
| Judge Uwe Schwengelbeck | Locked |
At the UPC: Hanshow France SAS (6 cases)·SES-imagotag SA (9 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 285/2025·UPC CFI 84/2025·UPC CoA 618/2024·UPC CoA 1/2024·UPC CFI 360/2023 and 1 more
Decisions
- 2024-10-11Procedural OrderPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division issued a costs assessment order following provisional measures proceedings, determining recoverable legal costs for Hanshow's four defendant entities, finding a reasonable time expenditure of up to 150 hours per attorney and 40 hours per patent attorney, resulting in total assessed costs of approximately EUR 154,400.
Show the legal issues (3)
- costs assessment R.150 RoP
- reasonable legal fees for group of defendants
- plausibility check without itemised time records
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2025-11-27 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-10-11 | Not public |
| Kostenerstattung | 2024-10-11 | Public |
| Comments pursuant to RoP264 | 2024-04-01 | Not public |
| weitere Stellungnahme | 2024-03-11 | Public |
| Anlage TW KFA 3 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme im Kostenfestsetzungsverfahren | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 2 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 3 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme im Kostenfestsetzungsverfahren | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 2 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 2 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme im Kostenfestsetzungsverfahren | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 3 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 3 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme im Kostenfestsetzungsverfahren | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 2 | 2024-03-05 | Not public |
| Comments pursuant to RoP264 | 2024-02-20 | Not public |
| Stellungnahme App_3393-2024 | 2024-01-23 | Public |
| Receipt | 2024-01-22 | Not public |
| Application | 2024-01-22 | Not public |
| Anlage TW KFA 1 | 2024-01-22 | Not public |