View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Centripetal LimitedOperating co.
Representatives- Ralph Nack-Noerr Partnerschaftsgesellschaft mbB
Respondents- Keysight Technologies, Inc.Operating co.
- Keysight Technologies Deutschland GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Klaus Haft-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 5, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Keysight Technologies, Inc.Admissible2025-02-28
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
At the UPC: Centripetal Limited (22 cases)·Keysight Technologies, Inc. (9 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 126/2026·UPC CoA 14/2026·UPC CFI 26/2026·UPC CoA 805/2025·UPC CFI 729/2024 and 4 more
3 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2025
Decisions
- 2025-09-05
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division denied Keysight Technologies' application to stay infringement proceedings pending EPO opposition proceedings against EP 3 821 580, finding that a non-binding preliminary EPO opinion and the advanced state of UPC proceedings did not justify a stay.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Stay of proceedings
- EPO opposition proceedings
- Preliminary EPO opinion non-binding
Documents
- 23E0E1E1FD48417051C22916A65134AE_en.pdf2025-09-05EN