View all cases
- Case details
- Status—Action—CategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Division
- —
- Technology
- ChemistryFood chemistry
- Language
- —
- EPO Opposition
- Limgroup B.V.Admissible2017-03-28
- SOMYCELAdmissible2017-03-28
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked |
| Judge Rute Lopes | Locked |
At the UPC: Amycel LLC (6 cases)·Szymon Spyra (2 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 1 other proceedings
4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 935/2025·UPC CFI 499/2024·UPC CoA 490/2024·UPC CFI 195/2024
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: 2024
Decisions
- 2024-06-21
Summary: The Hague Local Division rejected a request for simultaneous interpretation facilities between English and Polish at the oral hearing in the Amycel v. Spyra preliminary injunction proceedings, but granted a different request for interpretation under Rule 109.4 RoP after applying the double appropriateness test.
Show the legal issues (2)
- Interpretation facilities (Art. 51(2) UPCA, R. 109 RoP)
- Double appropriateness test for interpretation requests
Documents
- 2F5D5D308901F96E4D3BE209C55334A2_en.pdf2024-06-21EN