View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- C. Ronse
- K. Claeyé
- M.w. Rijsdijk
- D.e. Colenbrander
Respondents- OrthoApnea S.L.Operating co.
- Vivisol B BVOperating co.
Representatives- Van den Horst
- Niemeijer
- Division
- Brussels LD
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 8, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Brussels LD | Locked |
| Judge Samuel Granata | Locked |
| Judge Margot Kokke | Locked |
| Judge András Kupecz | Locked |
At the UPC: [Individual claimant - anonymised] (1 case)·OrthoApnea S.L. (7 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent4 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 232/2025·UPC CoA 456/2024·UPC CoA 430/2024·UPC CFI 376/2023
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Brussels LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-07-08
Summary: Procedural order of the Brussels Local Division in an infringement action concerning EP 2 331 036. The order addresses whether the claimant was permitted to supplement the factual basis and add equivalence infringement arguments in the Reply to the Statement of Defence, and whether the request/claims could be adapted. The order ruled on the admissibility of equivalence arguments raised at the reply stage.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Admissibility of equivalence arguments in Reply
- Content of Statement of Claim Rule 13 RoP
- Amendment of pleadings
Documents
- 4E32BDE3B130ADB88222433B210C6EAC_nl.pdf2024-07-08NL