View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Bolko Ehlgen-Linklaters LLP
- Julia Schönbohm-Linklaters LLP
- Olaf Isfortsupporting-Schneiders & Behrendt
Respondents- expert e-Commerce GmbHOperating co.
- expert klein GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Dirk Jestaedt-Krieger Mes & Graf von der Groeben
- Bernhard Ganahlsupporting-HGF Europe LLP
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringSemiconductors
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Aug 5, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Seoul Semiconductor Group (29 cases)·expert e-Commerce GmbH (14 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024·UPC CoA 762/2024 and 11 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-08-05Application RoP 333Public
Summary: Düsseldorf Local Division procedural order (judge-rapporteur Thomas) in infringement proceedings by Seoul Viosys / Seoul Semiconductor against expert GmbH entities concerning EP 3 926 698. The order addresses a late application to amend the patent (R. 30.2 RoP), deferring the admissibility decision on the amendment and setting a response deadline for the defendant. No substantive ruling.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Late application to amend the patent (R. 30.2 RoP)
- Timing of admissibility decision on patent amendment
- Response period for defendant to late amendment (R. 32.1 RoP)
Documents
- A5287B03C591D7BA4069E6473D54F225_de.pdf2024-08-05DE