View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Xiaomi H.K. LimitedOperating co.
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- —
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jul 31, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 5 other proceedings
UPC CFI 332/2024·UPC CFI 219/2023·ORD 25614/2024·ORD 40039/2024·ORD 7453/2024
7 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·CC 591342/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023 and 2 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-07-31
Summary: The Local Division Mannheim ordered alternative service under R.275.2 RoP after formal service via the Hague Service Convention was definitively refused by Chinese authorities on political grounds, and ruled that the court will not censor or redact documents at the request of a foreign central authority.
Show the legal issues (5)
- Service abroad (R.274-275 RoP)
- Hague Service Convention
- Alternative service (R.275.2 RoP)
- Refusal of service by foreign authority
- Content censorship by foreign authority
Documents
- 452F12411D947243E3A395E6F8CE757B_de.pdf2024-07-31DE