View all cases
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionPreliminary objectionCategoryPreliminary objection
- Parties
- Claimants
- Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
- Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH & Co. KGOperating co.
Representatives- Paul Szynka-CBH Rechtsanwälte
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringSemiconductors
- ChemistryMaterials, metallurgy
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 25, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Matthias Zigann | Locked |
At the UPC: Heraeus Electronics GmbH & Co. KG (9 cases)·Vibrantz GmbH (10 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 919/2025·UPC CoA 920/2025·UPC CFI 1510/2025·UPC CFI 448/2024·UPC CFI 114/2024 and 4 more
Decisions
- 2024-09-25Preliminary objectionPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division dismissed the request by Heraeus Precious Metals GmbH (co-claimant 2) to have Vibrantz's counterclaim for revocation rejected as obviously unfounded or inadmissible, holding that the counterclaim was properly directed against the registered patent proprietor.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Counterclaim for revocation admissibility R. 25 RoP
- Correct defendant in revocation counterclaim
- Registered vs. material patent proprietor
Documents
- 1EE549FF0BB3CF481ED2A9590760B26D_de.pdf2024-09-25DE