View all cases
UPC APP 51844/2024
EP3346403 · DATA PROCESSING, ANALYSIS METHOD OF GENE EXPRESSION DATA TO IDENTIFY ENDOGENOUS REFERENCE GENES
- Case details
- StatusClaim dismissedActionPreliminary objectionCategoryPreliminary objection
- Parties
- Respondents
- Myriad International GmbHOperating co.
- Myriad GmbHOperating co.
- Myriad Service GmbHOperating co.
- Myriad Genetics GmbHOperating co.
- Myriad Genetics S.A.S.Operating co.
- Myriad Genetics B.V.Operating co.
- Myriad Genetics S.r.l.Operating co.
- Myriad Genetics, Inc.Operating co.
- Eurobio ScientificOperating co.
Representatives- Hölder-Hoffmann Eitle
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- ChemistryBiotechnology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Feb 14, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Ulrike Voß | Locked |
At the UPC: GXD-Bio Corporation (8 cases)·Myriad Genetics Group (8 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 7 other proceedings
UPC CoA 32/2026·UPC CoA 33/2026·UPC CFI 192/2026·UPC CFI 195/2026·UPC CFI 681/2024 and 2 more
Decisions
- 2025-02-14Preliminary objectionPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division rejected the preliminary objection of eight Myriad Genetics defendants challenging UPC jurisdiction and the claimant's standing to sue, holding that questions of standing and entitlement to asserted claims relate only to the merits and not to jurisdiction under Art. 32 UPCA.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Preliminary objection to jurisdiction (R. 19.1 RoP, Art. 32 UPCA)
- Standing to sue (Art. 47 UPCA)
- Jurisdiction vs. merits distinction
Documents
- 0899C4EDD50C35DBA6FEDACA968A0B92_en.pdf2025-02-14EN