View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- OROPE Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Andreas Kramer
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 17, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·OPPO Group (57 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023·ORD 38680/2024 and 4 more
5 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CFI 332/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 219/2023·UPC CFI 331/2024
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-09-17
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division rejected Panasonic's application to hear its party expert as a witness at the oral hearing in FRAND/infringement proceedings, finding the application was submitted after close of the interim proceedings and no sufficient grounds existed.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Expert witness hearing
- FRAND counterclaim
- Interim proceedings Rule 110 RoP
Documents
- 21FA65E3E2F13519780F24B94413AEEF_de.pdf2024-09-17DE