UPC APP 57843/2024

—·EP3918974: COMPUTERIZED REFRACTION AND ASTIGMATISM DETERMINATION

Case details: Status
—
Action
Procedural application
Category
Other Procedural
Parties: Claimants
Visibly Inc.
Reps: Marc Grunwald
Respondents
Easee B.V.
Yves Prevoo
Easee Holding B.V.
Reps: Yves Prevoo
Division: Hamburg LD
Judges: Sabine Klepsch · Presiding Judge
Stefan Schilling · Legally qualified judge / judge-rapporteur
Mojca Mlakar · Legally qualified judge
Steven Kitchen · Technically qualified judge
Technology: Pharmaceutical & Medical
Language: —
First decided: May 30, 2025

Decisions

2025-05-30
Generic application
Final order of Hamburg Local Division in Visibly Inc. v Easee B.V. / Easee Holding B.V. / Yves Prevoo (EP 3 918 974) ordering the defendants (as counterclaimants for revocation) to provide joint security of EUR 75,000 for the claimant's legal costs, pursuant to Art. 69(4) UPCA and R. 158 RoP. The court held that Art. 69(4) UPCA does not oblige the defendant to provide security in the infringement action, but a claimant may request security from a defendant acting as counterclaimant in revocation proceedings.
Legal issues:Security for costs under Art. 69(4) UPCA / R. 158 RoPObligation to provide security: scope (defendant as counterclaimant only)Balance between claimant's security interest and defendant's right to effective remedy

Documents