View all cases
UPC APP 58035/2024
Oct 24, 2024·EP4201327 +1 more: FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
- Case details
- StatusWritten PhaseActionGenericCategoryCosts Assessments
- Parties
- Division
- Milan LD
- Technology
- Packaging & Conveying
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Dec 30, 2024
Decisions
- 2024-12-30DismissedCostsGeneric application
Milan Local Division dismissed Insulet Corporation's application for a cost decision following the rejection of EOFLOW Co. Ltd.'s intervention request in PI proceedings (EP 4 201 327). The court found the application inadmissible: a cost decision under R. 150 RoP requires a prior decision on costs in principle under R. 118.5 RoP. The order rejecting the intervention (1 October 2024) contained no such costs-in-principle decision, so the cost-determination application lacked the prerequisite under R. 156(e) RoP. Insulet was invited to resubmit once a costs award decision was obtained.
Legal issues:Prerequisite of costs-in-principle decision for cost determination application (R. 150, 156 RoP)Cost decision following rejection of intervention request
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2025-01-08 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-12-30 | Not public |
| finale order 30 December 2024 | 2024-12-30 | Public |
| rule 152 ROP | 2024-11-11 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2024-10-24 | Not public |
| Application for Cost Decision | 2024-10-24 | Not public |
| Exhibit PS-C01 | 2024-10-24 | Not public |