View all cases
UPC APP 59991/2024
EP3320602 · ROTARY ELECTRIC MACHINE PROVIDED WITH A RESERVOIR OF LUBRICANT FOR LUBRICATING A ROLLING BEARING AND FOR COOLING THE MACHINE
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryOther procedural
- Parties
- Claimants
- Valeo ElectrificationOperating co.
Representatives- Felix Rödiger-Bird & Bird LLP
- Jonas Smeets-Bird & Bird LLP
- Fabian Saupe-Bird & Bird LLP
- Nicolas Cardonsupporting
- Amandine Ricardsupporting
- Florian Saadisupporting
Respondents- Magna PT B.V. & Co. KGOperating co.
- Magna PT s.r.o.Operating co.
- Magna International France, SARLOperating co.
Representatives- Klaus Haft-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Sabine Agé-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Sebastian Kratzer-Hoyng Rokh Monegier
- Wolfgang Kellentersupporting-Hengeler Mueller
- Jan Ackermannsupporting-Cohausz & Florack
- Felipe von Heeremansupporting-Cohausz & Florack
- Margarete Rittstiegsupporting-Cohausz & Florack
- Division
- Dusseldorf LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringElectrical machinery, apparatus, energy
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Nov 20, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Dusseldorf LD | Locked |
| Judge Berenice Thom | Locked |
| Judge Mélanie Bessaud | Locked |
| Judge Alessandro Sanchini | Locked |
At the UPC: Valeo Group (34 cases)·Magna Group (21 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 719/2024·UPC CoA 689/2024·UPC CoA 691/2024·UPC CFI 657/2024·UPC CFI 459/2024 and 4 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Dusseldorf LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-11-20
Summary: The Düsseldorf Local Division dismissed Magna's application for rectification under R. 353 RoP of an injunction order, finding that the alleged omissions and characterisations regarding vehicle models and a French vindication action did not constitute clerical errors or obvious slips.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Rectification of order R. 353 RoP
- Clerical errors vs. substantive errors
- Scope of injunction
Documents
- 1E2CC9843C09A491D76058EB0A59808F_en.pdf2024-11-20EN