UPClytics
ENDE
Sign inStart trial
View all cases

UPC CFI 1321/2025

Oct 28, 2025·EP3016464 SEP · METHOD FOR MEASURING DISCOVERY SIGNAL, BASE STATION, AND TERMINAL

Follow
Case details
Status
Written Phase
Action
Infringement
Category
Main infringement action
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Judges
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Language
English
First decided
Jun 11, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Infringement foundMedian days to first decision
All UPC53% (62/117)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Daniel VossLockedLocked
Judge Rute LopesLockedLocked
Judge Georg WernerLockedLocked
Judge Alessandro SanchiniLockedLocked

At the UPC: Advanced Standard Communication LLC (8 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)

Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patent

This dispute contains 4 other proceedings

UPC CoA 67/2026·UPC CFI 1340/2026·UPC CFI 398/2025·UPC CFI 617/2024

3 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 74/2026·UPC CFI 798/2025·UPC CFI 87/2026

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2025

Decisions
  • 2026-06-11
    Public

    Summary: The presiding judge of Local Division Munich partially granted and partially rejected the claimant's request for a two-week extension of the deadline for its Reply to the Statement of Defence and Defence to the Counterclaim for revocation. The deadline was extended only until 24 June 2026 (two days beyond the original 22 June 2026 date) due to weekend day adjustments, with the full two-week extension to 6 July 2026 refused on grounds that it would jeopardise adequate preparation for the oral hearing of 11 December 2026.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Deadline extension under Rule 29(a) RoP
    • Case management and preparation of oral hearing
    • Joint hearing with related case UPC_CFI_617/2024
Documents
Show all 384 documents
Document titleDatePublic
Order2026-10-20Public
Order2026-10-19Not public
Order2026-10-19Not public
Order2026-10-19Not public
Communication2026-10-19Not public
Other Documents2026-10-19Not public
Receipt2026-09-02Not public
Cover sheet2026-09-02Not public
Further pleadings2026-09-02Not public
Further pleadings2026-09-02Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.

  • Weekend days causing the deadline to fall on a Monday justify a minimal extension to 24 June 2026

    ClaimantLegal basis: Rule 29(a) RoP
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.

  • Agglomeration of submission deadlines across parallel proceedings in June justifies a two-week extension to 6 July 2026

    ClaimantLegal basis: Rule 9.3 RoP; Rule 29(a) RoP