UPC CFI 434/2024
Jul 23, 2024·EP4151181 Unitary patent · PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
- Case details
- StatusCase Closed (Patent infringed)ActionCounterclaim for infringementCategoryCounterclaim for infringement
- Parties
- Claimants
- Edwards Lifesciences CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Bryce Matthewson-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Siddharth Kusumakar-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Tessa Waldron-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Bryce Ma
- Adam Rimmer-Powell Gilbert (Europe) LLP
- Jonas Weickert-Thum & Partner
- Bernhard Thum-Thum & Partner
Respondents- Meril Life Sciences Pvt Ltd.Operating co.
- Meril GmbHOperating co.
- Meril Italy srlOperating co.
Representatives- Andreas Johannes Nikolaus von Falck-Hogan Lovells International LLP
- Emmanuel Larere-Cabinet Gide Loyrette Nouel AARPI
- Jean-Hyacinthe de Mitry-Cabinet Gide Loyrette Nouel AARPI
- Jonathan Stafford-Marks & Clerk LLP
- Gregory Carty Hornsby-Marks & Clerk LLP
- Division
- Paris CD
- Technology
- InstrumentsMedical technology
- Language
- English
- First decided
- Oct 20, 2025
- EPO Opposition
- Meril GmbHAdmissible2024-11-28
| Infringement found | Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|---|
| All UPC | 53% (62/117) | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Catallozzi | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Tatyana Zhilova | Locked | Locked |
| Judge Elisabetta Papa | Locked | Locked |
At the UPC: Edwards Lifesciences Group (57 cases)·Meril Group (60 cases)
This dispute contains 13 other proceedings
UPC CFI 1160/2026·UPC CoA 932/2025·UPC CoA 933/2025·UPC CFI 404/2025·UPC CFI 405/2025 and 8 more
1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
- 2025-10-20Revocation ActionPublic
Summary: Decision of the Paris Central Division (Paris Seat) dated 20 October 2025 in the revocation action by Meril entities against Edwards Lifesciences Corporation and the counterclaim for infringement by Edwards regarding EP 4 151 181 B1 (prosthetic heart valve technology). The revocation action was rejected; however, the patent was maintained only in the form of Auxiliary Request 2 (amended). The infringement counterclaim was granted: Meril entities were found to infringe claims 1, 4, 6–12 as amended. Edwards was granted an injunction preventing Meril from all infringing acts with products according to those claims in Contracting Member States, with an exception for XL-size valves (exceeding 30 mm) which was denied on proportionality grounds. Meril was ordered to provide information on infringing products, recall and destroy infringing products, and publish the decision in five media. Damages are to be determined in separate proceedings. Costs of the counterclaim were borne by Meril jointly and severally; costs of the revocation action were shared (each party bears own costs given the patent amendment dynamic).
Show the legal issues (6)
- Inventive step assessment using holistic approach
- Revocation action versus patent amendment
- Infringement counterclaim
- Proportionality of injunction for XL-size medical devices
- Public interest exception to injunctive relief under Art. 63(1) UPCA
- Recall and publication orders
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Case closed | 2026-04-24 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Exhibit document Defendant | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Exhibit document Defendant | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Application document Defendant | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-12-09 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Application document Claimant | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Receipt | 2025-11-21 | Not public |
| Cover sheet | 2025-11-21 | Not public |