UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CFI 451/2024

Jul 30, 2024·EP1552399 · INTEGRATED CIRCUIT AND METHOD FOR ESTABLISHING TRANSACTIONS

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent upheld as granted)
Action
Counterclaim for revocation
Category
Counterclaim for revocation
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Munich LD
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Computer technology
Language
English
First decided
Mar 11, 2026
How this compares
The court's record for this kind of case, counted in first-instance rulings. A figure in brackets is the number of rulings a rate rests on.
Patent revokedMedian days to first decision
All UPC37% (34/91)124
Munich LDLockedLocked
Judge Daniel VossLockedLocked
Judge Pierluigi PerrottiLockedLocked
Judge Georg WernerLockedLocked
Judge Andrea ScillettaLockedLocked

At the UPC: Qualcomm Group (28 cases)·Network System Technologies LLC (77 cases)

This dispute contains 13 other proceedings

UPC CoA 68/2026·UPC CoA 69/2026·UPC CoA 70/2026·UPC CoA 71/2026·UPC CoA 72/2026 and 8 more

22 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CoA 265/2024·UPC CoA 217/2024·UPC CoA 218/2024·UPC CoA 219/2024·UPC CoA 220/2024 and 17 more

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Munich LD·2024

Decisions
  • 2026-03-11
    revocation counterclaim

    Summary: 1. The Infringement action is dismissed. 2. The Counterclaim for revocation is dismissed.

Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Hearing recording reference document2026-04-01Not public
Decision2026-03-16Public
Case closed2026-03-11Not public
Decision2026-03-11Not public
Final Order2026-03-11Not public
Decision2026-03-11Not public
Order2026-03-10Not public
Order2026-03-10Public
Order2026-02-10Not public
Order2026-02-10Public
Oral procedure closed2026-02-10Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-15Not public
Other document Defendant2025-12-15Not public
Receipt2025-12-15Not public
Cover sheet2025-12-15Not public
Further pleadings2025-12-15Not public
Receipt2025-12-15Not public
Order2025-12-10Not public
Order2025-12-10Public
Interim procedure opened2025-12-10Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-24Not public
Further pleadings2025-11-24Not public
Receipt2025-11-24Not public
Communication2025-11-14Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-13Not public
Application document Defendant2025-11-13Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-11-13Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-11-13Not public
Receipt2025-11-13Not public
Cover sheet2025-11-13Not public
Further pleadings2025-11-13Not public
Exhibit document Defendant2025-11-13Not public
Receipt2025-11-13Not public
Order2025-10-20Not public
Order2025-10-20Public
Order2025-10-15Not public
Order2025-10-15Public
Other Documents2025-10-15Not public
Summons to oral hearing2025-10-15Not public
Summons2025-10-15Public
Order2025-10-15Not public
Order2025-10-15Public
Outcome of the Order2025-09-03Not public
2025-09-03 - Order R.158 RoP2025-09-03Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-08-28Not public
2025-08-21 Order - invitation to comment re R.158.12025-08-21Not public
Receipt2025-08-21Not public
Counterclaim - Security for costs - Request of Qualcomm2025-08-20Not public
Comments re. hearing dates - Qualcomm2025-07-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 12025-07-18Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 42025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 32025-07-18Not public
Exhibit P CR 22025-07-18Not public
2025-07-15 - Order - inv to comment on pre dates et al2025-07-15Not public
Hearing-Dates2025-07-15Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-05-26Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-05-26Not public
2025-05-26 Order re deadline extension2025-05-26Public
2025-05-26 Order re deadline extension2025-05-26Public
Reply-Amend-Patent-Defence2025-05-22Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-05-22Not public
Pleading2025-05-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 12025-05-22Not public
Pleading2025-05-22Not public
Exhibit P CR 12025-05-22Not public
Receipt2025-05-15Not public
Receipt2025-05-15Not public
Request for extension of deadline2025-05-14Not public
Request for extension of deadline2025-05-14Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-22Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-22Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-22Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-04-22Not public
Defence to Application to amend patent2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 102025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 11a2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 112025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 102025-04-22Not public
Defence to Application to amend patent2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 11a2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 112025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 102025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 112025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 11a2025-04-22Not public
Defence to Application to amend patent2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 11a2025-04-22Not public
Reply to the Defence2025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 102025-04-22Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 112025-04-22Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-03-29Not public
Outcome of the Order2025-03-29Not public
2025-03-29 Order2025-03-29Public
2025-03-29 Order2025-03-29Public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-03-27Not public
Comments pursuant to RoP2642025-03-27Not public
Response of Qualcomm2025-03-27Not public
Response of Qualcomm2025-03-27Not public
2025-03-24 Order - deadline extension and invitation to comment2025-03-24Not public
2025-03-24 Order - deadline extension and invitation to comment2025-03-24Not public
Receipt2025-03-19Not public
Receipt2025-03-19Not public
Time extension - Request of Qualcomm2025-03-18Not public
Time extension - Request of Qualcomm2025-03-18Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-05Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-02-05Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2025-02-05Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2025-02-05Not public
Exhibit AR12025-02-05Not public
Exhibit AR12025-02-05Not public
Application2025-02-05Not public
Pleading2025-02-04Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-11-29Not public
2024-11-29 - Order - Extension of time limits2024-11-29Public
Receipt2024-11-14Not public
Exhibit ED 52024-11-13Not public
Exhibit ED 62024-11-13Not public
Application2024-11-13Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-10-01Not public
2024-10-01 - Order - Deadline extension re Reply to SoD and Defence to CC2024-10-01Public
Receipt2024-09-30Not public
Exhibit ED 42024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 42024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 22024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 32024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 12024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 22024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 12024-09-27Not public
Application2024-09-27Not public
Exhibit ED 32024-09-27Not public
Notification Of Service2024-09-09Not public
Zustellnachweis2024-09-09Not public
Access to case2024-09-09Not public
Acknowledgement of access to case2024-08-05Not public
epoUploadDocumentsWorkflow2024-08-05Not public
Document from EPO2024-08-05Not public
Letter for Service2024-08-01Not public
Panel-Appointment2024-08-01Not public
EPO-Request-for-case-pending2024-08-01Not public
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-08-01Not public
Formal-checks_Notification-of-positive-outcome2024-08-01Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR08_part2_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR01_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR09_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR07_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR05_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR08 part 1 - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit BP-CR 02024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR02_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR04_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR06_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR03_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Exhibit_BP-CR08_part3_Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Counterclaim for Revocation - Qualcomm2024-07-30Not public
Accepted arguments
What the court agreed with — by party.
  • The prior art references 'Goossens' and 'Rijpkema' (and related documents 'Goossens 2', 'Rijpkema 2', 'Drake') do not disclose or render obvious the claimed connection-oriented communication-manager/resource-manager architecture of claim 1; the patent is novel (Art. 54 EPC) and involves an inventive step (Art. 56 EPC).

    ClaimantLegal basis: Art. 54, 56 EPC; the Court examined 'Goossens' and 'Rijpkema' as realistic starting points for inventive step and found the claimed teaching not obvious over them (paras 179-265)
  • The accused Qualcomm NoC ICs, built on Arteris NoC technology, do not establish a 'connection' with a communication manager and resource manager as required by claim 1; the Arteris NoC Chapter relied on by the Claimant does not originate from or describe the Defendants' actual chip design.

    RespondentLegal basis: claim construction of features 2-6 ('connection', 'communication manager', 'resource manager'); paras 266-308
Rejected arguments
What the court did not agree with — and why.
  • The German Federal Patent Court's decision revoking the German part of the patent-in-suit should lead the UPC to stay proceedings, or should be treated as prejudicial to validity.

    RespondentLegal basis: the UPC held it has its own competence to decide validity and was independently convinced of the patent's validity; the national decision was not yet final (paras 264-265)
  • The Defendants should be ordered under Art. 59(1) UPCA / R.190 RoP to produce the 'Qualcomm source code' and related technical documents to prove infringement.

    ClaimantLegal basis: R.190 RoP requires reasonably available and plausible evidence already presented before an order to produce further evidence can issue; the Claimant's case rested only on the (disputed, non-Defendant-authored) Arteris NoC Chapter, which the Court found did not plausibly show infringement (paras 309-327)