View all cases
UPC CoA 586/2024
Oct 7, 2024·EP2671173: METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING
- Case details
- StatusCase ClosedActionAppealCategoryMain Appeal
- Parties
- RespondentsReps: Prof. Tilmann Müller-Stoy (Bardehle Pagenberg); Nadine Westermeyer (Bardehle Pagenberg)
- Division
- Court of Appeal
- Judges
- Technology
- Computing & AI
- Language
- English
Decisions
- 2024-10-09DismissedRequest for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)
Court of Appeal (Standing Judge) dismissed Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's request for discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) of the Paris Central Division's order for security for costs as inadmissible. The court held that Suinno had not first requested the Court of First Instance to grant leave to appeal, which is a prerequisite before seeking discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP. The fact that the CFI order failed to indicate the right to appeal under Rule 158.3 RoP did not change this: the omission could not be read as an implied grant of leave.
Legal issues:Admissibility of discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoPRequirement to seek leave to appeal before requesting discretionary reviewFailure to indicate appeal right under Rule 158.3 RoPSecurity for costs
Documents
| Document title | Date | Public |
|---|---|---|
| Acknowledgement-of-lodging | 2024-10-09 | Not public |
| Headnote-and-Keywords | 2024-10-09 | Not public |
| Outcome of the Order | 2024-10-09 | Not public |
| Final order | 2024-10-09 | Public |
| Panel-Appointment | 2024-10-09 | Not public |
| Payment receipt from ERP software -paid today | 2024-10-07 | Not public |
| Request for Discretionary Review | 2024-10-07 | Not public |