UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 586/2024

Oct 7, 2024·EP2671173 · METHOD AND MEANS FOR BROWSING BY WALKING

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Claim dismissed)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Telecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
Language
English
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked

At the UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 cases)·Microsoft Group (34 cases)

Decisions
  • 2024-10-09
    Request for a discretionary review (RoP 220.3)Public

    Summary: Court of Appeal (Standing Judge) dismissed Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's request for discretionary review (Rule 220.3 RoP) of the Paris Central Division's order for security for costs as inadmissible. The court held that Suinno had not first requested the Court of First Instance to grant leave to appeal, which is a prerequisite before seeking discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP. The fact that the CFI order failed to indicate the right to appeal under Rule 158.3 RoP did not change this: the omission could not be read as an implied grant of leave.

    Show the legal issues (4)
    • Admissibility of discretionary review under Rule 220.3 RoP
    • Requirement to seek leave to appeal before requesting discretionary review
    • Failure to indicate appeal right under Rule 158.3 RoP
    • Security for costs
Documents
Document titleDatePublic
Acknowledgement-of-lodging2024-10-09Not public
Headnote-and-Keywords2024-10-09Not public
Outcome of the Order2024-10-09Not public
Final order2024-10-09Public
Panel-Appointment2024-10-09Not public
Payment receipt from ERP software -paid today2024-10-07Not public
Request for Discretionary Review2024-10-07Not public