UPClytics
View all cases

UPC CoA 774/2024

Dec 6, 2024·EP3926698 · LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

Case details
Status
Case Closed (Patent revoked)
Action
Appeal
Category
Main appeal
Parties
Claimants
Representatives
Respondents
Representatives
Division
Court of Appeal
Technology
  • Electrical engineering
    Semiconductors
Language
German
First decided
Oct 2, 2025
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
Median days to first decision
All UPC124
Judge Rian KaldenLocked
Judge Patricia RombachLocked
Judge Ingeborg SimonssonLocked
Judge Torsten DuhmeLocked
Judge Max TilmannLocked

At the UPC: expert e-Commerce GmbH (14 cases)·Seoul Semiconductor Group (29 cases)

This dispute contains 16 other proceedings

UPC CoA 380/2025·UPC CFI 823/2024·UPC CFI 824/2024·UPC CFI 677/2024·UPC CoA 762/2024 and 11 more

1 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent

UPC CFI 258/2025

Start a free trial to see how each one ended.

More cases: Court of Appeal·2024

Decisions
  • 2025-10-02
    Appeal RoP220.1Public

    Summary: German-language version of the Court of Appeal decision in the Seoul Viosys v expert appeal (counterclaim for revocation and infringement action). Claims 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 of the patent (LED device, EP 698) revoked for added matter in force for Austria, Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Sweden. All infringement claims dismissed. Viosys ordered to bear costs of both instances for both the revocation and the infringement action.

    Show the legal issues (3)
    • Added matter (Art. 123(2) EPC)
    • Revocation for added matter
    • Translation of international application and content of disclosure
Document titleDatePublic
Communication2025-10-20Not public
Cover sheet2025-10-10Not public
Other document Appellant2025-10-10Not public
Receipt2025-10-10Not public
Order2025-10-10Not public
Order2025-10-10Public
Cover sheet2025-10-09Not public
Application2025-10-09Not public
Receipt2025-10-09Not public
Case closed2025-10-02Not public