UPC_CoA_774/2024

LIGHT EMITTING DIODE

BerufungenHauptberufungCourt of AppealAppealCase Closed

Übersicht Entscheidungen Zitate Dokumente Zeitverlauf

Parteien

Kläger

expert e-Commerce GmbH
expert klein GmbH

Vertreter: Dirk Jestaedt (KRIEGER MES Partnerschaft mbB); Bernhard Ganahl (HGF Europe LLP)

Beklagte

Seoul Viosys Co., Ltd.

Vertreter: Bolko Ehlgen (Linklaters LLP); Dipl.-Phys. Olaf Isfort (Schneiders & Behrendt)

Richter

Rian Kalden
Patricia Rombach
Ingeborg Simonsson
Torsten Duhme
Max Tilmann

Patente

EP3926698

CPC-Codes: H10H20/0137, H10H20/82, H10H20/034, H10H20/0363, H10H20/816, H10H20/835, H10H20/819, H10H20/825, H10H20/84, H10H20/833, H10H20/8506, H10W72/227…

Sektor: Semiconductor Devices

Ausgang

Nichtig erklärt

Eingereicht: 6. Dez. 2024

Erste Entscheidung: 2. Okt. 2025

Sprache: German

German-language version of the Court of Appeal decision in the Seoul Viosys v expert appeal (counterclaim for revocation and infringement action). Claims 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 of the patent (LED device, EP 698) revoked for added matter in force for Austria, Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands and Sweden. All infringement claims dismissed. Viosys ordered to bear costs of both instances for both the revocation and the infringement action.

Im UPC-Register öffnen

Ansprüche

Streitig1, 4, 5, 6, 9

Nichtig erklärt1, 4, 5, 6, 9

Hinweise: Same CoA decision as UPC_CoA_764/2024 (consolidated); claims 1, 4, 5, 6 and 9 of EP 3 926 698 revoked for added matter; infringement dismissed.