UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges3Parties1Firms

Firm scorecards

Activity, side mix, division specialization, top clients.

Legal principlesummary validity assessment at pi stage limited to best three invalidity argumentsClear all

DLA Piper UK LLP

4 attorneys · 20 historical cases (full data)

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
11
Claimant-side
4
Respondent-side
7
Attorneys
4
Attorney roster
Names extracted from decision PDFs.
  • Constanze Krenz
  • David Kless
  • Joschua Fiedler
  • Philipp Cepl
Top divisions
  • Dusseldorf LD3
  • Court of Appeal3
  • Paris CD2
  • Munich LD1
  • Milan CD1
Top clients
  • Dyson Technology Limited4
  • CAN Srl Airxcel Europe2
  • Belkin International, Inc.2
  • Belkin GmbH2
  • Belkin Limited2
Recent cases
  • —ACT_589207/2023PI grantedDyson Technology Limited v SharkNinja Europe Limited
  • —UPC_APP_54390/2024Procedural onlyTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
  • —ACT_31493/2025WithdrawnKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin International, Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_18259/2024Procedural onlyToyota Motor Europe NV/SA v Neo Wireless GmbH & Co. KG
  • —UPC_APP_32860/2025SettledTruma Gerätetechnik GmbH & Co. KG v CAN Srl Airxcel Europe
  • —UPC_APP_5729/2025WithdrawnSharkNinja Italy S.R.L. v Dyson Technology Limited
  • —UPC_APP_36247/2025SettledEyesmatch Ltd v Microsoft Corp.
  • —UPC_CFI_57/2024SettledSharkNinja Italy S.R.L. v Dyson Technology Limited
  • 2025-08-29UPC_CoA_813/2025PI grantedDyson Technology Limited v DREAME INTERNATIONAL (HONGKONG) LIMITED
  • 2025-01-02UPC_CoA_845/2024Procedural onlyKoninklijke Philips N.V. v Belkin GmbH
  • 2023-10-19UPC_CFI_361/2023WithdrawnToyota Motor Europe v Neo Wireless GmbH Co. KG