Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Berenice Thom
Dusseldorf LD
Total cases
171
PI grant rate
75%
Infringement rate
0%
Median time-to-decision (days)
182
Roles
—
Outcome breakdown
- Pending109
- Procedural only16
- Withdrawn7
- PI granted4
- Costs only3
- Settled2
- PI denied2
- Not infringed2
- Revoked2
- Partially revoked1
- Permanent injunction1
- Infringed1
Roles
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- 2026-02-13UPC_CFI_604/2026Dusseldorf LD—Ecovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock Germany GmbH
- 2025-12-30UPC_CFI_2283/2025Dusseldorf LD—Grifols Diagnostics Solutions Inc. v Roche Diagnostics GmbH
- 2025-12-22UPC_CFI_2102/2025Dusseldorf LD—Bekaert Binjiang Steel Cord Co., Ltd v Siltronic AG
- 2025-12-18UPC_CFI_2047/2025Dusseldorf LD—Atlas Copco Industrial Technique AB v Apex Tool Group, LLC
- 2025-12-10UPC_CFI_1928/2025Dusseldorf LD— v Wilhelm Julius Teufel GmbH
- 2025-12-10UPC_CFI_1927/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyOttobock SE & Co. KGaA v BrainPortfolio Inc.
- 2025-11-27UPC_CFI_1747/2025Dusseldorf LD— v Angelalign France Technology SASU
- 2025-11-18UPC_CFI_1616/2025Dusseldorf LD—Komax Holding AG v Hacint Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd.
- 2025-11-17UPC_CFI_1600/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyLiNA Medical AG v Tonglu Qianyan Medtech Co., Ltd.
- 2025-11-17UPC_CFI_1599/2025Dusseldorf LD—Komax Holding AG v Hacint Intelligence Technology Co., Ltd.
- 2025-11-01UPC_CFI_1368/2025Dusseldorf LD—Storz Medical AG v E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A.
- 2025-10-30UPC_CFI_1367/2025Dusseldorf LD—Storz Medical AG v E.M.S. Electro Medical Systems S.A.
- 2025-10-13UPC_CFI_1141/2025Dusseldorf LD—Boa Technology Inc. v Zuatu Cycling International d.o.o.
- 2025-10-01UPC_CFI_998/2025Dusseldorf LD—Boa Technology Inc. v FLA Europe NV
- 2025-10-01UPC_CFI_996/2025Dusseldorf LD—Boa Technology Inc. v FLA Europe NV
- 2025-09-16UPC_CFI_809/2025Dusseldorf LDProcedural onlyVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd
- 2025-09-10UPC_APP_36626/2025Dusseldorf LD—Hoffmann Eitle PartmbB v Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
- 2025-09-10UPC_APP_36621/2025Dusseldorf LD—Hoffmann Eitle PartmbB v Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
- 2025-09-02UPC_CFI_833/2025Dusseldorf LD—Samsung Electronics France S.A.S. v Headwater Research LLC
- 2025-09-01UPC_CFI_820/2025Dusseldorf LD—Samsung Electronics GmbH v Headwater Research LLC
- 2025-08-27UPC_APP_35167/2025Dusseldorf LD—Access Advance LLC v Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI)
- 2025-08-25UPC_CFI_786/2025Dusseldorf LD—Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH v N.V. Nutricia
- 2025-08-25UPC_CFI_784/2025Dusseldorf LD—Nestlé Health Science (Deutschland) GmbH v N.V. Nutricia
- 2025-08-07UPC_CFI_716/2025Dusseldorf LDSettledElectronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) v Hisense Gorenje Germany GmbH
- 2025-08-04UPC_APP_33803/2025Dusseldorf LD—Name not displayed for GDPR reasons. Represented by Bernhard GANAHL v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd