Judge intelligence
Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.
Böttcher
Mannheim LD
Total cases
46
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
100%
Median time-to-decision (days)
217
Roles
legally_qualified, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
- Procedural only38
- Infringed2
- Costs only2
- Dismissed2
- Not infringed1
- Revoked1
Roles
- Judge-Rapporteur
- Judge-Rapporteur (Mannheim Local Division)
- Judge-Rapporteur / Legally Qualified Judge
- Judge-rapporteur
- Judge-rapporteur (Berichterstatter)
- Judge-rapporteur (legally qualified judge)
- Legally Qualified Judge
- Legally Qualified Judge / Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Judge-Rapporteur
- Legally Qualified Judge and Rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge
- Legally qualified judge / judge-rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge and judge-rapporteur
- Legally qualified judge, judge-rapporteur
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
- —UPC_APP_46519/2024Mannheim LDProcedural onlyDISH Technologies L.L.C. v AYLO PREMIUM LTD
- —UPC_APP_34857/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyWilus Institute of Standards and Technology, Inc. v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
- —UPC_APP_33041/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyFaro Technologies, Inc. v PMT Technologies (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
- —UPC_APP_35377/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyEyesmatch Ltd v Samsung Electronics GmbH
- —UPC_APP_34743/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyCentripetal Limited v Keysight Technologies, Inc.
- —UPC_APP_23446/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyHurom Co., Ltd. v NUC Electronics Europe GmbH
- —ORD_15984/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
- —UPC_APP_45837/2024Mannheim LDProcedural onlyPanasonic Holdings Corporation v Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH
- —CC_51398/2024Mannheim LDProcedural onlyTexas Instruments Incorporation v TOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC
- —ACT_579338/2023Mannheim LDInfringedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
- —UPC_APP_46521/2024Mannheim LDProcedural onlyDISH Technologies L.L.C. v AYLO PREMIUM LTD
- —UPC_APP_35089/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyDecathlon v OWIM GmbH & Co. KG
- —UPC_APP_66435/2024Mannheim LDCosts onlyDISH Technologies L.L.C. v AYLO PREMIUM LTD
- —UPC_APP_23057/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyMalikie Innovations Ltd. v Discord Inc.
- —UPC_APP_18490/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v Texas Instruments Incorporation
- —ORD_33617/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyZTE Corporation v Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- —UPC_APP_32611/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyFingon LLC v Samsung Electronics GmbH
- —UPC_APP_20490/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlySunstar Engineering Europe GmbH v CeraCon GmbH
- —UPC_APP_35652/2025Mannheim LDCosts onlyFaro Technologies, Inc. v PMT Technologies (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
- —UPC_APP_20197/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlyTOTAL SEMICONDUCTOR, LLC v Texas Instruments Incorporation
- —UPC_APP_24543/2025Mannheim LDNot infringedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
- —CC_65106/2024Mannheim LDInfringedbellissa HAAS GmbH v Windhager GmbH
- —UPC_APP_22060/2025Mannheim LDProcedural onlySamsung Electronics Co. Ltd. v ZTE Deutschland GmbH
- —UPC_APP_42970/2024Mannheim LDProcedural onlyHurom Co., Ltd. v NUC Electronics Europe GmbH
- —ACT_578818/2023Mannheim LDRevokedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH