View all cases
UPC APP 45837/2024
EP2568724 SEP +1 more · Radio Communication Device and Radio Communication Method
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Xiaomi Technology France S.A.S.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Italy S.R.L.Operating co.
- Xiaomi Technology Netherlands B.V.Operating co.
- Odiporo GmbHOperating co.
- Shamrock Mobile GmbHOperating co.
Representatives- Corin Gittinger-Freshfields
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringDigital communication · Telecommunications
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Sep 10, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
| Judge Dirk Böttcher | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
| Judge Klaus Loibner | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·Xiaomi Group (92 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
This dispute contains 16 other proceedings
UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CoA 86/2024·CC 591342/2023·CC 594274/2023·UPC CFI 219/2023 and 11 more
11 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CFI 332/2024·UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 1354/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 472/2023 and 6 more
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-09-10Application RoP 333Public
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division issued an order on panel review under Rule 333 RoP of a time extension granted by the judge-rapporteur in the Panasonic v. Xiaomi parallel infringement proceedings concerning EP 2 568 724 and EP 2 207 270.
Show the legal issues (1)
- Panel review of time extension (R. 333 RoP)
Documents
- 2A25340D99D580E1C4B9312B8840C5C1_de.pdf2024-09-10DE