UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions4Judges4Parties2Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principlestrict application principle under Art. 76(1) UPCA for patent amendmentClear all

Agergaard

Dusseldorf LD · Mannheim LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
14
PI grant rate
—
Infringement rate
67%
Median time-to-decision (days)
—
Roles
legally_qualified
Outcome breakdown
  • Procedural only9
  • Infringed1
  • Permanent injunction1
  • Revoked1
  • Not infringed1
  • Dismissed1
Roles
  • Legally Qualified Judge
  • Legally qualified judge
  • Rechtlich qualifizierter Richter
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —ORD_29159/2025Procedural onlyQUANTIFICARE S.A. v Canfield Scientific, Inc.
  • —UPC_CFI_834/2025Procedural onlyEcovacs Robotics Co., Ltd. v Roborock (HK) Limited
  • —ORD_15984/2025Procedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —ACT_579338/2023InfringedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_32878/2025Permanent injunctionigus GmbH v Whale Technology (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.
  • —ACT_578818/2023RevokedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_35497/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
  • —UPC_APP_28969/2025Procedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —ACT_590302/2023Not infringedTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • —ORD_32794/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG
  • —ORD_36553/2024Procedural onlyTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • —UPC_APP_29027/2025DismissedFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —UPC_APP_13218/2025Procedural onlyTridonic GmbH & Co KG v CUPOWER Shenzhen Xiezhen Electronics Co., Ltd
  • —UPC_APP_35917/2025Procedural onlyTRUMPF Laser- und Systemtechnik SE v IPG Laser GmbH & Co. KG