UPC Analytics
ENDE
Analytics1Cases1Decisions3Judges2Parties0Firms

Judge intelligence

Ruling tendencies, PI grant rate, time-to-decision per judge. French-seated divisions are anonymized at the individual level.

Legal principleimminent infringement must arise directly from conduct of potential infringerClear all

Rute Lopes

Brussels LD · Dusseldorf LD · Hamburg LD · Lisbon LD · Milan LD · Munich LD · Nordic-Baltic RD · Paris LD · The Hague LD

Clear and return to cohort view
Total cases
76
PI grant rate
75%
Infringement rate
67%
Median time-to-decision (days)
105
Roles
legally_qualified, presiding, rapporteur
Outcome breakdown
  • Pending38
  • Procedural only21
  • Withdrawn5
  • PI granted3
  • Infringed2
  • Revoked2
  • Costs only1
  • Dismissed1
  • PI denied1
  • Not infringed1
  • Settled1
Roles
  • Legally Qualified Judge
  • Legally qualified judge
  • Presiding Judge and Rapporteur
  • Presiding judge and Judge-rapporteur
  • Presiding judge and judge-rapporteur
  • Presiding judge, judge-rapporteur
Recent cases
Latest filings where this judge sat on the panel.
  • —UPC_APP_61143/2024Procedural onlyFUJIFILM Corporation v Kodak GmbH
  • —ACT_61133/2024Costs onlyArvato Netherlands B.V. v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
  • —UPC_APP_10014/2025DismissedMul-T-Lock France v IMC Créations
  • —UPC_APP_43606/2024Procedural onlyEdwards Lifesciences Corporation v Meril Lifesciences PVT Limited
  • —UPC_APP_35134/2024Procedural onlyAmycel LLC v Szymon Spyra
  • —UPC_APP_48229/2024Procedural onlyTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_31180/2025Procedural onlyTIRU v MAGUIN SAS
  • —UPC_APP_30813/2025Procedural onlyTIRU v VALINEA ENERGIE
  • —UPC_APP_12517/2025WithdrawnTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_12519/2025WithdrawnTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_11625/2025WithdrawnTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —ACT_3186/2025PI deniedBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v ZENTIVA PORTUGAL, LDA
  • —ACT_63643/2024Procedural onlyTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —ORD_46326/2024Procedural onlyTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_22313/2025Procedural onlyTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v ASUSTek Computer Inc.
  • —UPC_APP_16910/2025WithdrawnArcelorMittal v XPENG INC
  • 2026-03-06UPC_CFI_850/2026—Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co, Ltd v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (PUBL)
  • 2026-02-05UPC_CFI_481/2026—SILIMED Indústria de Implantes Ltda. v Polytech Health & Aesthetics GmbH
  • 2026-01-27UPC_CFI_282/2026Procedural onlyGowling WLG v ZENTIVA PORTUGAL, LDA
  • 2026-01-12UPC_CFI_102/2026—Xiaomi Technology Germany GmbH v AX Wireless, LLC
  • 2025-12-12UPC_CFI_1963/2025Procedural onlyVALEO SYSTEMES D’ESSUYAGE v ROBERT BOSCH DOO Beograd
  • 2025-12-10UPC_CFI_1920/2025—Illumina, Inc. v Element Biosciences, Inc.
  • 2025-11-12UPC_CFI_1547/2025—NovaCloud Licensing, LLC v Amazon.com, Inc.
  • 2025-10-28UPC_CFI_1321/2025—Advanced Standard Communication LLC v Xiaomi Inc.
  • 2025-09-12UPC_CFI_858/2025Procedural onlyBoehringer Ingelheim International GmbH v ZENTIVA PORTUGAL, LDA