Overview · Filed: —
ORD_23089/2024
Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersCourt of AppealGeneric Order—
This case cites
Authorities cited within the decisions on file for this case.
Rules of Procedure · 2
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 220.1(c) | jurisdiction | Binding | An ambiguity arising when reading Article 62 UPCA and Rules 220.1(c) and 224.1(b) RoP together, in combination with incorrect, or at least incomplete, information provided by the Court of First Instance. |
| 224.1(b) | jurisdiction | Binding | An ambiguity arising when reading Article 62 UPCA and Rules 220.1(c) and 224.1(b) RoP together, in combination with incorrect, or at least incomplete, information provided by the Court of First Instance. |
EPC article · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62 | urgency | Binding | An ambiguity arising when reading Article 62 UPCA and Rules 220.1(c) and 224.1(b) RoP together, in combination with incorrect, or at least incomplete, information provided by the Court of First Instance, has led the appellant to believe that a two months' time period applied for an appeal of an order. |
UPC (CFI) · 1
| Target | Legal point | Strength | Excerpt |
|---|---|---|---|
| UPC_CFI_214/2023 | urgency | Background | Date: 20 October 2023, ORD_572699/2023 (in ACT_551054/2023 concerning, inter alia, a request for a preliminary injunction and evidentiary measures; decided together with the infringement action ACT_545571/2023) |
Cited by
Subsequent UPC decisions citing this case.
Not yet cited in another decision in our corpus.