UPClytics
Overview · Filed:

ORD_23089/2024

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersCourt of AppealGeneric Order
  • 2024-04-26Procedural onlyappeal_decisionGeneric Order

    Court of Appeal (26 April 2024) ruled that AIM Sport Development AG was entitled to the longer appeal period under R. 224.1(a) RoP (2 months) rather than R. 220.1(c) (15 days) for lodging a statement of appeal, because the CFI incorrectly combined infringement and provisional measures proceedings in one decision without distinction, creating an excusable error on AIM's part.