UPClytics
Overview · Filed:

ORD_32908/2025

WASTE INCINERATION PLANT AND PROCESS

Procedural & sub-applicationsCase Management OrdersCourt of AppealGeneric Order
  • 2025-07-15Procedural onlyappeal_decisionGeneric Order

    The Court of Appeal upheld the Luxembourg Local Division's preservation of evidence order granted ex parte against MAGUIN SAS (and VALINEA ENERGIE) at the request of TIRU, the patent proprietor of EP 578 (an incineration furnace-related patent). The CoA confirmed the lower division correctly exercised its discretion on urgency and the risk of evidence loss. MAGUIN's challenge to the ex parte grant and its loyalty duty arguments were rejected. The appeal was dismissed on all substantive grounds.

  • 2025-07-15Procedural onlyevidenceGeneric Order

    Court of Appeal order concerning an application for review of an order to preserve evidence in the dispute between MAGUIN and TIRU/VALINEA over patent EP3178578. The CoA upheld the first-instance order to preserve evidence, finding that: the time taken by TIRU to file the application did not undermine urgency; the risk of disappearance of evidence was sufficient; and the Local Division properly exercised its discretion. The appeal by MAGUIN was dismissed.