UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC APP 28415/2025

·EP2643717: COLOR-MIXING CONVERGENT OPTICAL SYSTEM

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Verfahrensart
Verfahrensantrag
Kategorie
Sonstige prozessuale
Parteien
Kläger
Vertreter: Alexander Koller (NOMOS Rechtsanwälte GmbH)
Beklagte
Vertreter: Hosea Haag (Ampersand Partnerschaft von Rechtsanwaelten mbB)
Division
Munich LD
Richter
Technology
Display & Signage
Sprache
Erste Entscheidung
2. Juli 2025
Entscheidungen
  • 2025-07-02
    Generic application

    Procedural order on a security-for-costs application by claimant SWARCO FUTURIT against intervener Shenzhen Dianming Technology Co., Ltd. The court addressed whether an admitted intervener is subject to security-for-costs obligations under R. 158 RoP. Intervener's primary request to reject the security application was considered; a separate ruling on the merits of the security application was issued.

    Rechtsfragen:Security for costs against intervener (R. 158 RoP)Intervener treated as party (R. 315.4 RoP)
Dokumente
  • B52FC83542D6870D0E282BE47EAC2E35_de.pdf2025-07-02GERMAN