UPClytics
Alle Fälle anzeigen

UPC CFI 297/2025

7. Apr. 2025·EP2080349 · SHARING MULTIMEDIA CONTENT IN A PEER-TO-PEER CONFIGURATION

Verfahrensdetails
Status
Case Closed (Patent verletzt)
Verfahrensart
Verletzung
Kategorie
Hauptverletzungsklage
Division
Dusseldorf LD
Technologie
  • Electrical engineering
    Digital communication
Sprache
English
Erste Entscheidung
2. Sept. 2026
Im Vergleich
Die Bilanz des Gerichts für diese Art von Verfahren, gezählt in erstinstanzlichen Entscheidungen. Eine Zahl in Klammern gibt an, auf wie vielen Entscheidungen eine Quote beruht.
Verletzung festgestelltMedian Tage bis zur ersten Entscheidung
Gesamt-UPC53% (62/117)124
Dusseldorf LDGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Ronny ThomasGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Jule SchumacherGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Mojca MlakarGesperrtGesperrt
Richter Dennis KretschmannGesperrtGesperrt

Vor dem UPC: InterDigital Group (34 Verfahren)·Disney Group (26 Verfahren)

Entscheidungen
  • 2026-09-02
    InfringementÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Düsseldorf Local Division order (Panel 1, 2 Sep 2026, R. 262A RoP) issued alongside the merits decision of the same day in InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS v The Walt Disney Company and ten affiliates (EP 2 080 349, UPC_CFI_297/2025 with UPC_CFI_651/2025): the information to be provided under items III.2 and III.3 of that decision's operative part is classified confidential, access is restricted to the claimant's outside counsel and two named representatives, use is limited to the stated purpose, and a penalty payment may be imposed for culpable breach.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)
    • R. 262A RoP protection of confidential information in the information to be provided under the merits decision
    • confidentiality club limited to outside counsel plus two named representatives
    • penalty payment for culpable breach
  • 2026-09-02
    InfringementÖffentlich

    Zusammenfassung: Düsseldorf Local Division decision (Panel 1, 2 Sep 2026) on InterDigital CE Patent Holdings SAS's infringement action UPC_CFI_297/2025 and Disney's counterclaim for revocation UPC_CFI_651/2025 concerning EP 2 080 349 (sharing multimedia content in a peer-to-peer configuration; in force in Germany and the Netherlands): the patent is revoked to the extent of claims 1, 4 and 8, claim 1 only beyond the limited wording of auxiliary request K5, and the counterclaim is otherwise dismissed; on that amended claim 1 the eleven Disney defendants indirectly infringe by supplying the Disney+ streaming service and are ordered to refrain from supplying it in Germany and the Netherlands, to provide information and accounts, and are held jointly and severally liable for damages since 14 Dec 2011 (successively to Sony Ericsson, Sony Group and the claimant); a declaration of infringement is granted, the interim damages award is refused, no enforcement security is imposed; costs 90/10 (infringement) and 70/30 (counterclaim) against the defendants; value EUR 3m each, cost ceiling EUR 600,000.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (5)
    • indirect (contributory) infringement by supplying a streaming service as means relating to an essential element (Art. 26 UPCA)
    • partial revocation and maintenance of claim 1 in the wording of auxiliary request K5 (novelty, inventive step)
    • liability for damages of successive proprietors' losses since 2011 (Art. 68 UPCA)
    • no enforcement security under R. 118.8 RoP where the claimant is clearly solvent (contrast UPC_CFI_87/2025)
    • interim award of damages refused
  • 2025-09-17

    Zusammenfassung: Procedural order from the Düsseldorf Local Division (UPC_CFI_297/2025 and UPC_CFI_651/2025) in InterDigital's infringement action against multiple Disney entities concerning EP 2 080 349. The order addressed a procedural matter in the ongoing infringement proceedings.

    Rechtsfragen anzeigen (1)
    • Procedural management of multi-defendant proceedings
DokumenttitelDatumÖffentlich
Mitteilung2026-10-16Nicht öffentlich
Anordnung2026-10-16Nicht öffentlich
Order2026-10-16Öffentlich
Receipt2026-10-08Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-10-08Nicht öffentlich
Document Claimant2026-10-08Nicht öffentlich
Receipt2026-10-02Nicht öffentlich
Cover sheet2026-10-02Nicht öffentlich
Application document Applicant2026-10-02Nicht öffentlich
Mitteilung2026-10-02Nicht öffentlich
Angenommene Argumente
Was das Gericht akzeptiert hat — nach Partei.
  • Claim 1 in the limited wording of auxiliary request K5 is novel and inventive and is indirectly infringed by the Disney+ service (web and apps) in Germany and the Netherlands

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: Art. 26, 63, 64, 67, 68 UPCA
  • Claims 1 (as granted), 4 and 8 are not valid and must be revoked

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 65 UPCA; Art. 54, 56 EPC
Zurückgewiesene Argumente
Was das Gericht nicht akzeptiert hat — und warum.
  • The patent should be revoked in its entirety, including the auxiliary requests

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 65 UPCA
  • An interim award of damages should be granted

    KlägerRechtsgrundlage: R. 119 RoP
  • Enforcement should be made dependent on the claimant lodging security

    BeklagterRechtsgrundlage: Art. 82(2) UPCA, R. 118.8 RoP