UPC_CFI_355/2023

LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE ORIGINAL PLATE, AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING LITHOGRAPHIC PRINTING PLATE

VerletzungHauptverletzungsklageDusseldorf LDInfringementCase Closed

Dieser Fall zitiert

In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
9.2	claim construction	Bindend	SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS: R. 9.2, 36 RoP - Rejection of further submissions
36	claim construction	Bindend	Pursuant to R. 36 RoP, the judge-rapporteur may, on a reasoned request by a party, allow further written submissions to be exchanged within a period to be specified
109.1	language regime	Bindend	SUBJECT OF THE PROCEEDINGS: Rule 109.1 RoP - Request for simultaneous interpretation
109.2	language regime	Bindend	This general principle is further specified in R. 109.2 (1) RoP to the effect that the Judge-Rapporteur shall decide whether and to what extent simultaneous interpretation is appropriate
150	language regime	Bindend	The costs of simultaneous interpretation in such a case shall be included in the costs of the proceedings, R. 150 RoP
109.2	language regime	Bindend	a party may, at its own expense, engage a simultaneous interpreter (Rule 109.2 (2) RoP in conjunction with Rule 109.4 of the RoP)
109.5	language regime	Bindend	the costs incurred shall not be regarded as costs of the proceedings within the meaning of the last sentence of Rule 109.5 RoP

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
69	claim construction	Bindend	The terms used in a claim should normally be given their broadest technically sensible meaning in the context of the claim. Art. 69 EPC and its Protocol do not provide a justification for excluding what is literally covered by the terms of the claims by a narrowing claim construction
123	added matter	Bindend	To comply with Art. 123(2) EPC, the subject-matter of an amended claim must be directly and unambiguously taught to the skilled person by the original application
51	language regime	Bindend	Pursuant to Art. 51(2) UPCA, any division of the Court of First Instance shall, at the request of a party and to the extent appropriate, provide interpretation to assist that party in oral proceedings

Quelle	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_CFI_363/2023	language regime	Überzeugend	cf. CFI, LD Dusseldorf, UPC_CFI_363/2023, procedural order of 12 July 2024

Zitiert in

Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.

Zitiert in	Datum	Rechtsfrage	Bindungskraft	Auszug
UPC_APP_24503/2025 Mannheim LD	18. Juli 2025	jurisdiction	Bindend	The defendant in an infringement action before the UPC, which relates to the UK part of a European bundle patent, is allowed to raise an invalidity defence without being obliged to file a national action for revocation in the UK... (following Local Division Dusseldorf, decision of 28 January 2025, UPC_CFI_355/2023).
UPC_APP_24543/2025 Mannheim LD	18. Juli 2025	invalidity defence without revocation counterclaim for UK part – inter partes effect only	Überzeugend	following Local Division Dusseldorf, decision of 28 January 2025, UPC_CFI_355/2023
UPC_APP_55795/2024 Milan LD	15. Apr. 2025	jurisdiction — non-UPC validated patents	Überzeugend	see Local Division Düsseldorf, Decision dated 28 January.2025, Fujifilm v Kodak (UPC_CFI_355/2023).
ACT_17434/2024 Paris LD	23. Mai 2025	jurisdiction	Bindend	lectrolux, as has already 2 been stated by several divisions of the UPC concerning non-Contracting Member States (concerning either EU States or third States, UPC_CFI_355/2023, LD Düsseldorf, 28 January 2025; UPC_CFI 702/2024, LD Paris, 21 March, 20
UPC_CFI_189/2024 Paris CD	17. Sept. 2024	time extension appropriate only in justified exceptional cases	Überzeugend	the power to extend the time limit should be used with caution and in justified exceptional cases (see LD Dusseldorf, order of 20 April 2024, UPC_CFI_355/2023