Übersicht · Eingereicht: 3. Juli 2024
UPC_CFI_380/2024
FLUID DELIVERY DEVICE WITH TRANSCUTANEOUS ACCESS TOOL, INSERTION MECHANISM AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING FOR USE THEREWITH
Einstweilige MaßnahmenEinstweilige MaßnahmenMilan CDProvisional measuresCase Closed
Dieser Fall zitiert
In den Entscheidungen dieses Falls zitierte Quellen.
Verfahrensordnung · 4
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 211.2 | jurisdiction — cumulative conditions for provisional measures | Bindend | the Applicant is required to provide cumulatively reasonable evidence to satisfy the Court with sufficient degree of certainty that: (i) the Applicant is entitled to initiate proceedings under Art. 47 UPCA; (ii) the patent is valid; (iii) its rights are being infringed or that such infringement is imminent (Rule 211.2 RoP). |
| 30.2 | claim amendment — auxiliary request to amend inadmissible in PI proceedings | Bindend | The auxiliary request to amend the patent pursuant to Rule 30.2 RoP is not admissible in the proceedings for provisional measures, in accordance with the necessary expediency of the procedure |
| 263.2 | claim amendment — amend case in pleadings vs patent amendments | Bindend | The phrase "amend its case" in Rule 263.2 RoP refers to the pleadings amendments ("change its claim") and does not relate to patent amendments pursuant to Rule 30 or 50.2 RoP. |
| 50.2 | claim amendment — distinction from pleading amendments | Bindend | The phrase "amend its case" in Rule 263.2 RoP refers to the pleadings amendments ("change its claim") and does not relate to patent amendments pursuant to Rule 30 or 50.2 RoP. |
EPÜ-Artikel · 1
| Quelle | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | jurisdiction — entitlement to initiate proceedings | Bindend | the Applicant is required to provide cumulatively reasonable evidence to satisfy the Court with sufficient degree of certainty that: (i) the Applicant is entitled to initiate proceedings under Art. 47 UPCA |
Zitiert in
Spätere UPC-Entscheidungen, die diesen Fall zitieren.
| Zitiert in | Datum | Rechtsfrage | Bindungskraft | Auszug |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| APL_64374/2024 Court of Appeal | 1. Mai 2025 | impugned order dismissing provisional measures application | Hintergrund | Milan Central Division, 22 November 2024, ORD_62486/2024, App_39640/2024, UPC_CFI_380/2024 |
| UPC_APP_9038/2025 Milan CD | 21. März 2025 | intervention — distinction of direct vs indirect interest | Überzeugend | see UPC_CFI_380/2024 Order no. ORD_52068/2024 CD Milan and in UPC_CFI_153/24 CD Munich) a distinction must be made between prospective interveners who have a direct interest in the outcome |
| UPC_APP_9038/2025 Milan CD | 21. März 2025 | costs in intervention sub-proceedings | Überzeugend | see CD Milan Order no. ORD_59988/2024 in UPC_CFI_380/2024 Application No. 39640/2024) that intervention pursuant to Art. 313 RoP is a sub-proceeding governed by rule of law |
| UPC_APP_58035/2024 Milan LD | 30. Dez. 2024 | costs — successful party may initiate cost procedure after intervention rejection | Überzeugend | See order no. ORD_52068/2024 UPC number: UPC_CFI_380/2024, filed on 1 October 2024 "the successful party did not make a claim for costs." |