UPC CoA 500/2023

Vor dem UPC: AIM Sport Development AG (15 Verfahren)·Supponor Group (14 Verfahren)

• 2024-04-26
  Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: Court of Appeal (26 April 2024) ruled that AIM Sport Development AG was entitled to the longer appeal period under R. 224.1(a) RoP (2 months) rather than R. 220.1(c) (15 days) for lodging a statement of appeal, because the CFI incorrectly combined infringement and provisional measures proceedings in one decision without distinction, creating an excusable error on AIM's part.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (4)

  • Time limit for lodging statement of appeal (R. 224.1 RoP)
  • Excusable error
  • Legitimate expectations
  • Mixed infringement/provisional measures decision
• 2024-02-26
  Öffentlich

  Zusammenfassung: The Court of Appeal ruled that AIM Sport's appeal (lodged as APL_596892/2023) against a first-instance decision dismissing the actions due to patent opt-out was filed out of the two-month time limit under R.220.1(c) RoP and was therefore inadmissible.

  Rechtsfragen anzeigen (3)

  • Admissibility of appeal – time limit (R.220.1(c) RoP)
  • Opt-out of European patent
  • UPC competence