View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- OROPE Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Andreas Kramer
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Feb 22, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
| Judge Holger Kircher | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·OPPO Group (57 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 9 other proceedings
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 596895/2023·UPC CoA 476/2023·UPC CFI 210/2023·ORD 38680/2024 and 4 more
5 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 543/2024·UPC CFI 332/2024·CC 591342/2023·UPC CFI 219/2023·UPC CFI 331/2024
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-02-22
Summary: Order of the Mannheim Local Division exercising discretion under Rule 37.2 RoP (Article 33(3) UPCA) to hear the infringement action and the counterclaim for revocation (including a FRAND licence counterclaim) together in the same proceedings. The panel decided that joint hearing of the infringement and invalidity claims is efficient and substantively advantageous.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Joint hearing of infringement and revocation counterclaim Art. 33(3) UPCA Rule 37.2 RoP
- FRAND licence counterclaim
- Case management
Documents
- 4FD9014934C9CC1A534C36963B3D2FBB_de.pdf2024-02-22DE