View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- OROPE Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Andreas Kramer
- Division
- Mannheim LD
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Feb 22, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Mannheim LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
| Judge Holger Kircher | Locked |
| Judge Edger Brinkman | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·OPPO Group (57 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 4797/2024·UPC CoA 478/2023·UPC CFI 216/2023·UPC APP 2352/2024 and 1 more
5 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 543/2024·CC 594296/2023·UPC CFI 218/2023·UPC CFI 329/2024·UPC CFI 330/2024
Start a free trial to see how each one ended.
More cases: Mannheim LD·2024
Decisions
- 2024-02-22
Summary: The Mannheim Local Division decided, under R. 37.2 and Art. 33(3) UPCA, to hear Panasonic Holdings Corporation's infringement action and OPPO's counterclaims for revocation and FRAND licence together before the same panel, finding joint adjudication efficient and consistent with uniform claim interpretation.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Joinder of infringement and revocation counterclaim proceedings under Art. 33(3) UPCA and R. 37 RoP
- FRAND licence counterclaim
- Early decision on proceedings management before end of written phase
Documents
- 11EE4C6A6B57FDF16510E3197138278A_de.pdf2024-02-22DE