View all cases
- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryCase management orders
- Parties
- Claimants
- Panasonic Holdings CorporationOperating co.
Representatives- Christopher Weber-Kather Augenstein
Respondents- OROPE Germany GmbHOperating co.
- Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd.Operating co.
Representatives- Andreas Kramer
- Division
- Munich LD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringComputer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- May 3, 2024
How this compares
How long the court takes to reach a first decision.
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Munich LD | Locked |
| Judge Peter Tochtermann | Locked |
At the UPC: Panasonic Group (81 cases)·OPPO Group (57 cases)
Start 14-day free trialAlready a user? Sign in
Related cases
All proceedings on this patentThis dispute contains 6 other proceedings
UPC CoA 298/2024·CC 4797/2024·UPC CoA 478/2023·UPC CFI 216/2023·ORD 7587/2024 and 1 more
5 other defendants litigating the same or a related patent
UPC CoA 543/2024·CC 594296/2023·UPC CFI 218/2023·UPC CFI 329/2024·UPC CFI 330/2024
Decisions
- 2024-05-03Procedural OrderPublic
Summary: The Munich Local Division issued a procedural order in SEP/FRAND infringement proceedings between Panasonic and OPPO/OROPE, addressing applications for disclosure of licence agreements under R. 190 RoP as evidence relevant to whether Panasonic's licensing terms were FRAND-compliant.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Disclosure of licence agreements
- FRAND licensing
- R. 190 RoP document production
Documents
- 1B42CBC40B2A1D56AA21434669F93DD9_de.pdf2024-05-03DE