- Case details
- Status—ActionProcedural applicationCategoryConfidentiality (RoP 262A / 262.2)
- Parties
- ClaimantsRepresentatives
- Mikko Kalervo Väänänen-Suinno Oy
- Division
- Paris CD
- Judges
- Technology
- Electrical engineeringTelecommunications · Digital communication · Computer technology
- Language
- —
- First decided
- Jun 26, 2024
| Median days to first decision | |
|---|---|
| All UPC | 124 |
| Paris CD | Locked |
| Judge Paolo Catallozzi | Locked |
At the UPC: Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy (29 cases)·Microsoft Group (34 cases)
This dispute contains 26 other proceedings
UPC CoA 51/2026·UPC CoA 21/2026·UPC CFI 544/2026·UPC CoA 911/2025·UPC CoA 883/2025 and 21 more
- 2024-06-26Application RoP262APublic
Summary: Paris Central Division procedural order ruling on Suinno Mobile & AI Technologies Licensing Oy's application to keep certain documents ('Agreement A & B') confidential from Microsoft Corporation and the public in infringement proceedings concerning EP 2 671 173. The court first rejected Microsoft's admissibility objection (that Suinno's representative, who was also the inventor and managing director, lacked independence under the Code of Conduct), finding the objection unfounded. The substantive confidentiality application was then assessed on its merits.
Show the legal issues (3)
- Confidentiality of business secrets (R. 262A RoP)
- Independence requirement for UPC representatives (Code of Conduct Art. 2.4.1)
- Representative who is also inventor and company director – admissibility challenge
- 8705579403ED89CDC79F4A79CC3BFC73_en.pdf2024-06-26EN